--- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Although I'm not terribly interested in this discussion, > I'm interested in how Lawson deals with your simple > question below, "How would you know?" Seems to me he's > just stating ideas in pronouncements, the same way they > were stated to him, without any more rational filtering > or analysis being performed on the output of those ideas > to you than was performed on the input of them to him. :-)
If you'd read the discussion, you'd know Lawson is talking about *what* Maharishi said, not whether what MMY said is *true*. See how Remarkably Stupid you are? Most people have no trouble making that simple distinction. You stumble badly over it all the time.
