On 06/11/2011 10:41 AM, sparaig wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu<noozguru@...> wrote: >> On 06/08/2011 10:18 AM, sparaig wrote: >>> --- In [email protected], Vaj<vajradhatu@> wrote: >>>> On Jun 8, 2011, at 2:52 AM, cardemaister wrote: > [...] >>>>> "Bhagavan S[h]ankara now left Prayaga, and travelling through the >>>>> skies, reached the splendid city of Mahismati... >>>> One, I wouldn't base his spiritual view on a fairy tale or what one >>>> says. And two, siddhis as obstructions applies to path, not fruition. >>>> >>> Certainly the sidhis are an obstruction. >>> >>> L. >> Well now that WOULD really depend on the path. They certainly aren't an >> obstruction in many tantric paths. ;-) >> >> Oh well, at least you folks aren't discussing Wiener's penis. :-D >> > Well, by obstruction on the path, I meant that they were an > obstacle-to-be-overcome: something that strengthens you as you overcome it. > > Lawson
In tantra they are an adjunct which makes you stronger.
