--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Who of us had not written that as our assessment of the Movement at this or > that time, for this or that project. > > And there are many ways of looking at the same situation. What was "crazy" > for one person was not crazy for another. Part of this may be due to > different perspectives on what was happening. > > It appears many comments about "crazy days, crazy projects, strange behavior" > is from a linear, project management sort of perspective -- thinking if we > are trying to accomplish X -- this is NOT the way to do it. Or, > alternatively, "why the hell are we doing project X". There are other > perspectives. Some may be closer to what MMY was actually doing. > > I'll state a perspective, not THE perspective, simply -- without the nuances. > The World Plan, Heaven on Earth, MIU, big projects, unconventional behavior, > etc were not about such initiatives. They were simply tools for MMY to help > us break our boundaries. > > Do you think conventional projects, plans and implementation are going to > break boundaries? No, they generally confirm the status quo. On the other > hand, crazy, outlandish, odd, squirmish projects were just that because we > had inner attachments, ego issues, projections, assumptions about how things > should be and what is normal, etc. Huge and or crazy projects, often both > were a set of tools that MMY used to break these internal boundaries. > > The outer fruits of the actions were up to nature -- and not the focus.
Bingo ! >
