Dear Turq,  I ain't muck raking and I certainly ain't making this stuff up 
neither.  It just happens to be journalism reporting.  

Well, you see there was a big entertainment event last nite on the Fairfield 
square where lots of community folks turned out.  This town is a very fun 
crossing of folks. Townies and rus.  In the community here I know folks 
bridging back four decades. Old friends.  Lots in the crowd I've known for 
decades.  One old R&B guy playing bass in the last set last nite on the square 
is of a group of some of my oldest friends here, Iowans who started TM back in 
Iowa City together back when.     

Well, you see in checking up with and interviewing the people I ran across, 
this account of the "facebook dome bannings" came out.  The people who told it 
in mixed company with-held the names involved but if pressed they could give 
them as the people involved were known to them.  I didn't need the names to 
know so I left it.  Apparently it was two people who were banned from the domes 
from their Facebook comments.  The account was quite credible enough.  The 
TM-taliban evidently is tightening things up again the way they see things.  
That is noteworthy.

-Buck in FF    

--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > >
> > > More recently they've taken to mining Facebook pages of 
> > > people on the Course, looking at the "Most Admired" lists 
> > > and then taking badges away by following up on that.  
> > 
> > To be perfectly honest, "Buck," I have come to take
> > the things you say with more than a grain of salt. It
> > seems to me that you sometimes go out of your way to
> > find things to manufacture outrage over or or to be
> > paranoid about. 
> > 
> > So you will have to forgive me if I inquire deeper 
> > into this claim. Is this something that you or people
> > you have talked to *claim*, or is it something they
> > could attest to, like in a court of law?
> > 
> > The former we can write off to ex-cultists' paranoia
> > about what their former cult might do to them. The
> > latter would be a cult gone mad.
> 
> (Says Barry hopefully...)
>


Reply via email to