You will understand the context within which I use the word "women" to be 
metaphorical. As in Maharishi was the greatest Lover (spiritually), so I react 
to all women (spiritual teachers who would seduce one with the doctrine of 
enlightenment). I insert this for readers who might have taken me literally: 
that my experiences with MMY somehow led me to a form of hopeless misogyny. Not 
true: as my love for Gaga proves.

--- In [email protected], maskedzebra <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> 
> wrote:
> >
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Blue Caboose <bluecaboose@...>
> Date: June 21, 2011 7:51:15 PM EDT
> To: Blue Caboose <bluecaboose@...>
> Subject: FFL:CDBJune 21,2011
> 
> p a Saint - Lose Your Badge
> 
> FWIW Masked Zebra Ravi seems to be a decent guy underneath his persona. But he
> doesn't seem to want to share that level of himself here too much. I wouldn't
> take all the bizzaro putdown pimp whore talk personally. It is more formulaic
> than focused on what you really write here. You wont get a back and forth from
> him on any topic but if he decides to take something more seriously for a 
> minute
> he can be very entertaining. As he says he is drunk on the divine and that is
> probably the best way to deal with him. (If by divine he means jello shots) He
> can be a cheery contributor to the madness here and he certainly grew on me.
> (till I got some wart-a-way)
> 
> I hope you continue to post and find your groove here once you have us all
> sorted out. I believe your contribution here is highly unique and I for one
> have been digging your posts. As I get to know more about your perspective I
> hope I can lob some questions your way that you might find interesting enough 
> to
> consider. I only knew OF you when I was at MIU in the late 70's, so it is nice
> to hear from the man behind the mask. (or zebra if you prefer)
> 
> Oh and if it wouldn't be too much trouble, do you think you could sprinkle in 
> a
> few paragraph breaks now and then? I hate to have to fight the format to get 
> to
> what you are saying.
> 
> I hope you feel welcome brother.
> 
> RESPONSE: Thanks for the welcome, CDB. Your posts probably were what got me 
> to accept RA's invitation to contribute here. Powerful intellect and big 
> heart—or so this is how it seems to me in reading what you write on this 
> blog. I especially appreciate your introducing me to the context here. 
> Thoughtful, hilarious, and apposite. I feel after reading this I have my 
> bearings. 
>    
>    By all means, lob your questions my way. I will enjoy the opportunity to 
> write into that mind of yours. And I will adjust my paragraphing.
> 
>    If you will permit me to say so, I especially enjoy the strength of your 
> convictions—I don't sense (so far anyway) the sublimation of your real 
> personality into the metaphysic of the East. Something that is anathema to me 
> (as you can understand). I had this super romance spiritually (MMY), and now 
> I tend to react negatively. to all women. And I think Lady Gaga wiser than 
> Amma. 
> 
> Yeah, it's going to be good, CDB—or at the very least interesting. You pack 
> the right kind of wallop in my opinion. So, let her rip. 
>    
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Ravi Yogi" <raviyogi@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], maskedzebra <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > You know, Ravi Yogi, Rick Archer invited me to post on this blog. When
> > I looked over the blog, it seemed pretty dangerous—that is, as I
> > said to RA, I might get eaten alive by the sacred monsters on this blog.
> > Perhaps for my own good, I don't know. But I was somewhat apprehensive
> > about posting here because it seemed from my first impression that I
> > might really be in for it. But I posted several times; no problem. Then,
> > this morning, I discover YOUR POSTS. What I lack (I am sincere here,
> > believe me) is some context within which to understand your dismissal of
> > me in the terms you have used: Prodigal Pimp. Who knows? maybe it fits
> > perfectly, but it's just I haven't come across this characterization of
> > myself. Perhaps, after being eviscerated on this blog by Ravi Yogi I
> > will beat a hasty retreat. It depends on whether you can substantiate
> > this judgment of me (PP) or not. Meantime I will (you will understand
> > this) have to resort to the most disguised as well as the most blatant
> > irony in order to protect my reputation in my own eyes. After all, it's
> > not what other people choose to think about you, it's what you think
> > about yourself. I just want to defend myself to the utmost (on behalf of
> > myself) so as to put off as long as possible the possible impact of this
> > indictment. The indictment implied in your unflattering estimation of
> > me. Should I take this personally, Ravi Yogi? Or should I just play
> > along with you, seeing whether you really will knock me off of this
> > blog? Could it be—I am just speculating here—that you, as a born
> > Hindu, assume as a given an assumption about the validity of the Eastern
> > view of reality which itself needs to be challenged? But I don't know
> > nothing, Ravi. I am only (as you can see) taking the measure of this
> > opposition which has suddenly come out into the open. I don't relish one
> > of them food fights that sometimes get started on this blog. If you are
> > going to deliver the real intellectual ordinance, why then I'll have to
> > anticipate possible permanent injury. And I will step away and nurse my
> > wounds, hoping they don't prove fatal.
> > >
> > > No, really, Ravi Yogi, I am a nice guy. I think you've got be wrong.
> > Give me a chance, will you?
> > >
> > Welcome to FFL, Rick Archer invited me as well and I got hazed. I'm just
> > continuing the long tradition of FFL hazing. But I gave my hazers hell,
> > they are still licking their wounds especially Barry aka turquoiseb. You
> > are indeed too nice by comparison :-)
> 
> RESPONSE: Appreciate this too. I can handle the hazing. My irony quotient is 
> always equal to my love quotient. So I'll be fine.
> Looking toward to the experiences that are coming up. Thanks again for this.
> >
> 
> > FWIW Masked Zebra Ravi seems to be a decent guy underneath his persona.  
> > But he doesn't seem to want to share that level of himself here too much.  
> > I wouldn't take all the bizzaro putdown pimp whore talk personally.  It is 
> > more formulaic than focused on what you really write here.  You wont get a 
> > back and forth from him on any topic but if he decides to take something 
> > more seriously for a minute he can be very entertaining.  As he says he is 
> > drunk on the divine and that is probably the best way to deal with him. (If 
> > by divine he means jello shots)  He can be a cheery contributor to the 
> > madness here and he certainly grew on me. (till I got some wart-a-way)
> > 
> > I hope you continue to post and find your groove here once you have us all 
> > sorted out.  I believe your contribution here is highly unique and I for 
> > one have been digging your posts.  As I get to know more about your 
> > perspective I hope I can lob some questions your way that you might find 
> > interesting enough to consider.  I only knew OF you when I was at MIU in 
> > the late 70's, so it is nice to hear from the man behind the mask. (or 
> > zebra if you prefer)
> > 
> > Oh and if it wouldn't be too much trouble, do you think you could sprinkle 
> > in a few paragraph breaks now and then?  I hate to have to fight the format 
> > to get to what you are saying.
> > 
> > I hope you feel welcome brother.
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Ravi Yogi" <raviyogi@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], maskedzebra <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You know, Ravi Yogi, Rick Archer invited me to post on this blog. When
> > > I looked over the blog, it seemed pretty dangerous—that is, as I
> > > said to RA, I might get eaten alive by the sacred monsters on this blog.
> > > Perhaps for my own good, I don't know. But I was somewhat apprehensive
> > > about posting here because it seemed from my first impression that I
> > > might really be in for it. But I posted several times; no problem. Then,
> > > this morning, I discover YOUR POSTS. What I lack (I am sincere here,
> > > believe me) is some context within which to understand your dismissal of
> > > me in the terms you have used: Prodigal Pimp. Who knows? maybe it fits
> > > perfectly, but it's just I haven't come across this characterization of
> > > myself. Perhaps, after being eviscerated on this blog by Ravi Yogi I
> > > will beat a hasty retreat. It depends on whether you can substantiate
> > > this judgment of me (PP) or not. Meantime I will (you will understand
> > > this) have to resort to the most disguised as well as the most blatant
> > > irony in order to protect my reputation in my own eyes. After all, it's
> > > not what other people choose to think about you, it's what you think
> > > about yourself. I just want to defend myself to the utmost (on behalf of
> > > myself) so as to put off as long as possible the possible impact of this
> > > indictment. The indictment implied in your unflattering estimation of
> > > me. Should I take this personally, Ravi Yogi? Or should I just play
> > > along with you, seeing whether you really will knock me off of this
> > > blog? Could it be—I am just speculating here—that you, as a born
> > > Hindu, assume as a given an assumption about the validity of the Eastern
> > > view of reality which itself needs to be challenged? But I don't know
> > > nothing, Ravi. I am only (as you can see) taking the measure of this
> > > opposition which has suddenly come out into the open. I don't relish one
> > > of them food fights that sometimes get started on this blog. If you are
> > > going to deliver the real intellectual ordinance, why then I'll have to
> > > anticipate possible permanent injury. And I will step away and nurse my
> > > wounds, hoping they don't prove fatal.
> > > >
> > > > No, really, Ravi Yogi, I am a nice guy. I think you've got be wrong.
> > > Give me a chance, will you?
> > > >
> > > Welcome to FFL, Rick Archer invited me as well and I got hazed. I'm just
> > > continuing the long tradition of FFL hazing. But I gave my hazers hell,
> > > they are still licking their wounds especially Barry aka turquoiseb. You
> > > are indeed too nice by comparison :-)
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to