Thanks Rick. I guess it is his email reader that isn't wrapping. I'll bet it is something that Richard can choose. I love to type fast (well fast for ME!) and this return at the end of the line deal isn't hardwired.
This might turn out to be an amazing metaphor for a lot of stuff that goes on here in the direction of miscommunications! What say ye Richard, do you have an auto wrap feature? This email blissfully disregarded the return at the end of the line. How does it look compared to the last post on this topic? I think that the fact that only Barry and Judy come through perfectly for him is one of the funnier things I have heard. Perhaps Richard is being instructed to only read their posts by the universe and I shouldn't try to interfere! --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@...> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 9:59 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Help a Saint - Lose Your Badge > > > > > > --- In [email protected] > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "richardjwilliamstexas" > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > curtisdeltablues: > > > Oh and if it wouldn't be too much trouble, do you > > > think you could sprinkle in a few paragraph breaks > > > now and then? I hate to have to fight the format > > > to get to what you are saying. > > > > > Maybe throw in some sentence breaks with the Enter > > key too. Apparently there are only three respondents > > on this list that know how to format for making > > easy replies on newsgroups: Judy and Barry. > > > > Go figure. > > I tried it a number of times and never got any feedback that it > worked from you so I figured it wasn't worth the trouble. I'll try > it in this post and you can let me know if it is a better format for > email readers. Web readers see it just fine. I wonder if any other > email readers have this problem with my posts? > > I'm an email reader. I've never had any problem with your posts. >
