On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:07 PM, blastedactresses wrote: > "Dear maskedzebra - all I see is a lot of intellectual jugglery and nothing > concrete. Can you please, if it's even possible for you, describe in a few > lines each on your enlightenment, the reasons why you thought it was mystical > deceit and your current de-enlightenment process. Please use generic terms - > there's someone like me who has no knowledge of CC, GC and shudder....thank > god I don't :-). " > > > ( Accuracy, detail, substance, and specifics appear to be the kryptonite > of most message broad presentations. > > " Intellectual jugglery" and total absence of " concrete" facts are the main > styles of all that is sold on line. When asked for specifics, all the > reasons for not providing any will be trotted out along with a series of > obfuscations and misdirection, all with an utmost of lofty plausible could > be sounding big words to make one appear intelligent. > > Opinions and spin and personal points of views misrepresented as facts is > the basis of all that can be found in these discussions, for the most part. > )
For a mere 8 dollars and 50 cents the secrets of the multiverse could be yours!
