"Hey blastedactresses: Before I lose you altogether, I'd better take a crack at the Werner probe of yours (previous post). Would you be willing to suspend your judgment (as expressed here) if I come through on that topic—providing more detail about my personal encounter with WE? Also, I aim to respond to Ravi's questions when I can get to them.
I am intrigued by your name: blastedactresses. I hate categorical judgments—especially when they put me in a negative light. But I'll do my best to fight your theory, BA." (RESPONSE: maskedzebra, I have no doubt you have experiences to talk about and opinions about those experiences and a superior vocabulary to express these things. But based on your earlier post , I do doubt you will make any honest attempt to distinguish between your spin and accounting of events and what actually happened. I Would be open to be proven wrong here. But if you did it it would be a first on the internet. In my experience, the facts are just not that interesting. The spin is what sells on line and posters rarely make any distinction between the two, either out of lack of awareness of any distinction or out of dishonesty or laziness. People are too afraid to present their interpretations of events as their interpretations. They are driven to add a suggestion that their interpretations is more important than it is and is close to reality and valid beyond the next persons. It is unavoidable almost. I can see it in my own post here. )
