Sal,

My only recent disappointment, with this thread, has been your absence. I'm 
now, 
with your help, nearing fulfilment although I'm going to resist any sense of 
oneness with anyone cause frankly, I just don't have time to respond to all the 
posts those feelings might create. I may be be sticking my neck out here, we're 
still in negotiations on his final package, book rights could be an issue, but 
I 
think I speak for MZ when I say anyone with as developed a sense of humour as 
you is welcome on the "World Tour". You can consider the chopper a done deal 
although we will have to speak about the tarot cards, don't forget we're going 
main stream here. Our demographic is the 99.9999999999999999 (you know what I 
mean) % the TMO has left behind.

Best.



________________________________
From: Sal Sunshine <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, June 28, 2011 6:51:12 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: another question for MZ, and maybe William of 
Occam

On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:09 PM, maskedzebra wrote:

> I am, however, going to ask you to slow down on the tour preparations. That's 
> a 
>pretty big move for this willed introvert (once exuberant performer).

Never mind the tour, mz~~could you just do another
helicopter drop?  That was one of the coolest sights
I've ever seen on the MUM campus.  That was real,
man.  It's definitely high time for a repeat.

> But if you can guarantee the cash up front, I might consider it.

Now you're talking like a true TMer!  Forget mantras, 
we *know* what's important, right?

> But in the meantime let me do a Novena on it, and then pay for a Yagya to be 
>down by the sages in India. I'll put in a fast and some silence while I'm at 
>it. 
>And, I promise you,  DO MY PROGRAM.

Aren't you forgetting the tarot cards and salt over
the shoulder?

> I've getting a little nervous that well before the week is out, I will find 
>myself approaching twelve o'clock (50 posts), and therefore will leave many of 
>my dear readers frustrated—and imperilled by their ignorance.

mz, that is thoughtful of you to consider your many
devoted readers here~~but, as the song says, if
you post out early, well...WE WILL SURVIVE.


> (Yes, you are right: this means I WILL continue to post.

Whew.

> Reason? It's that CurtisDeltaBlues fella—if he weren't on this blog I never 
>even would have begun to post—let alone be persuaded to stay with it for a 
>while 
>longer. I like that guy, even though I only know him from his posts—and his 
>music via video.)

Curtis is the real deal.

> But, who knows why? you have decided to put the welcome mat out for me, and 
>believe me, I appreciate it. I can keep my stiletto in my pocket (only used 
>for 
>defensive purposes of course) when writing to you. No tricky stick-handling—or 
>hard body-checks.
> 
> Yeah, that Maharishi guy, he was SOMETHING ELSE. No one yet has defined him 
> in 
>terms of how he appears in eternity (you know, at the level of the actual: 
>where 
>things get DONE in creation)—like what kind of greeting he got when he went 
>through his dying. No doubt about it, the shrewdest, most hardball, brilliant 
>(in more than an intellectual sense), slyly egotistical, beautiful, seductive 
>human being for two thousand years.

Yes, MMY and Jesus~~sooner or later their 
names will almost certainly become interchangeable.


> And more stage presence than anyone other than Jesus. But for all this, not a 
>good man, I think. Not, then, loved by God (wherever he is, whatever he's 
>doing). But so far, it seems, my life has pretty much been all about him—and 
>then getting the hate on for him. The best proof of God it seems to me (in 
>this 
>era at least: since we were born) is the very fact of the existence of someone 
>like Maharishi, for, like no one else could—or ever did since Christ—he made 
>you 
>feel: "This is It!"—he gave me (and you I must believe)—at least in the 
>beginning—the best version of what could be the TRUTH—measured by 
>EXPERIENCE—that was possible. Once he went down (sort of disgracing himself at 
>the end: becoming slightly mad and touched) then there was no one. All of us 
>former initiators are living in the negative or ambivalent (or for some, 
>positive) legacy of Maharishi. We can't help it. It sets us apart from the 
>rest 
>of humanity. A different form I guess of the mark of the beast. To try on 
>another metaphor.
> 
> About that Turq guy, i am sure he'll put me on my guard soon enough, but 
> given 
>your tacit warning, I think he must be doing a rope-a-dope, because but so far 
>at least, I don't get the feeling he is about to surprise me with a fast 
>uppercut. No blows landed so far. But, based upon your implicit estimation of 
>him, I'll be watching for the knock-out punch.

Turq is the real deal too~~he always saves his best
for when you're not looking for it.  

Sal



------------------------------------

To subscribe, send a message to:
[email protected]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links



    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to