--- In [email protected], "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@...> wrote:
>
> For those last few minutes of the day I sometimes enjoy 
> leafing through catalogs we get in the mail, the ones 
> filled with electronics and gadgets I won't buy. 

I used to get an electronics catalog years ago -- can't
remember the name, sorry -- that I really enjoyed because
they would sneak writeups of fake merchandise in with the
writeups of real merchandise. For example, in one issue
there was an offer for DEDs. Darkness Emitting Diodes. 
In another there was a blurb about the newest in chip 
technology, WOMs. Write Only Memory. The game, from 
their side, was to see how many people tried to order
the joke items.

> I haven't figured out why people seem to be obsessed 
> with reading books. I can't recall the last time I read 
> one cover to cover - it has easily been years. 

I found that my reading slowed down as my eyes got older,
and thus weaker. It actually took me some time to realize
that I hadn't been reading as much because I *couldn't*
read as easily as I had been able to in the past. It snuck
up on me. Once I realized what the problem was, a good 
reading light and some glasses did the trick. 

> Perhaps they are a fun distraction for overactive minds 
> - I don't know. 

People have different reasons for reading. Some do it to
relax, or as you say to distract them from their lives. I
do it because I love good writing. Sadly, that is often 
my bane when it comes to modern writing, because I have
high standards based on reading earlier writers. I think
I stopped reading for a year after having plowed through
my first Dan Brown novel. It took a re-read of Dorothy
Dunnett to get me back on track. :-)

Although books are not mentioned explicitly in this fair
use snippet from Wikipedia, I agree with Marshall McLuhan's
premise of "hot" and "cool" media, and I suspect (but don't
remember) that he would class books as "cool." I for one
wonder what he which he would have thought the World Wide
Web was. 

In the first part of Understanding Media, McLuhan also 
stated that different media invite different degrees 
of participation on the part of a person who chooses 
to consume a medium. Some media, like the movies, were 
"hot"—that is, they enhance one single sense, in this 
case vision, in such a manner that a person does not 
need to exert much effort in filling in the details 
of a movie image. McLuhan contrasted this with "cool" 
TV, which he claimed requires more effort on the part 
of the viewer to determine meaning, and comics, which 
due to their minimal presentation of visual detail 
require a high degree of effort to fill in details 
that the cartoonist may have intended to portray. A 
movie is thus said by McLuhan to be "hot", intensi-
fying one single sense "high definition", demanding 
a viewer's attention, and a comic book to be "cool" 
and "low definition", requiring much more conscious 
participation by the reader to extract value.

More comments below:

> --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the recommendations.  I wish I could find 
> > something I enjoy reading for a few minutes before I 
> > drop off to sleep.  

I can unreservedly pass along wayback's recommendation
for Dan Eagleman's "SUM: Forty Tales from the Afterlife."
It's just what the title implies, and brilliant. And the
stories are short, so it's perfect bedtime reading. You
can drop off to sleep after any story without feeling
that you still need to read more.

> > I am so narrow minded that I can't bring myself to read 
> > fiction and usually stick with something "spiritua"l in 
> > nature.  

In comparison, I read primarily fiction and avoid anything
"spiritua"l like it had a big herpes sore on its lip. :-)

> > But most of the modern new agey type books seem dull 
> > and full of platitudes.  

More than "seem," I'm afraid.

> > Lately I've been reading some of the lesser known early 
> > theosophists.  Even that has been somewhat dull.

Herpes city for me. I'm re-reading a book now because I 
need to analyze the author's writing style. He used a 
mechanism in this book that I need to use in something 
I am writing. The book is by Orhan Pahmuk, and is called 
"My Name Is Red." It's a murder mystery. But by a Nobel
Prize-winning author.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Name_Is_Red



Reply via email to