sparaig wrote: > > I think there's a problem with Clay's own understanding of stress and > TM, if he presented things that way:
David Clay didn't define stress in any way at all. He simply summed up the evidence that TM does something good and concluded that "release of stress" was inadequate to explain all the benefits. For example, consider the 1% phenomenon. Assuming it is a valid phenomenon -- I know we've beaten it up pretty badly around here -- it suggests consciousness is a field common to us all that influences behavior. > In MMY's > definition, stress is that which prevents you from being enlightened TM defines stress as an overload of experience. Well, what's ignorance? It's when experience overshadows the awareness of awareness itself. Maharishi's definition of stress is a Westernized definition of ignorance. - Patrick Gillam To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
