Of course, the question arises, who is toeing the party line who actually posts to this forum?
THis raises the question: just what is the party line? L. --- In [email protected], "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@...> wrote: > > "Several others seem to be able to contribute little more than > "piling on" to demonize the posters who don't toe the > TM Party Line, and call them uplifting names like donkeys." > > That was me Barry. You are one to talk, with the vile and disgusting words > you use against others.I called you and Vaj donkeys because I was trying to > be polite and not call you jackasses, jackass. > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > ...who had never practiced TM, and was here checking out > > the scene and trying to figure out whether there was any > > benefit for you in learning it, would you be favorably > > impressed by the words and actions of those who act as > > self-appointed "TM defenders" or "TM supporters" here? > > > > One, a newbie, seems to be dedicated to creating in other > > people the least favorable opinion possible of a guy who > > did nothing more than be honest about his TM experience > > with a filmmaker. Another relative newb is on a campaign > > to "out" anyone who posts here, so that he can know who > > exactly they are and where they live; one can only wonder > > why he wants to know this, and what plans he has for the > > heretics once he has learned this information. Several > > others seem to be able to contribute little more than > > "piling on" to demonize the posters who don't toe the > > TM Party Line, and call them uplifting names like donkeys. > > > > That's pretty much the "side" representing TM, and all > > that it has done for the TMers in question, who have now > > been practicing it for many years or decades. > > > > On the other "side," consider the simple post made by > > one of the people these "TM supporters" have been trying > > to demonize lately. Mark Landau made an honest and forth- > > right post, containing no antagonism and stooping to > > no name-calling, expressing more positive sentiments > > about Maharishi than all of the folks I mention above > > have made in all of their cumulative posts to FFL. > > > > If I were a lurker, I'd be looking at "What you focus > > on you become." It seems to me that on the whole those > > who have appointed themselves as "TM defenders" can't > > seem to do anything but "defend." They seem incapable > > of saying anything positive about that which they are > > defending, only negative things about those who they > > feel are "against" it. Meanwhile, one of the people > > they are trying diligently to demonize *was* able to > > post positive things about Maharishi and TM. Go figure. > > > > If I were a lurker, I sure know which I'd be more > > impressed by. > > >
