--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ravi Yogi" <raviyogi@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Curtis, In your new Avatar as the Mr. Nice Guy, > > > > Are you trying to parrot Judy's "Mr. Wonderful" putdown > > to score points with her? That is so cute. Usually > > opening with a vague ad hominem would make me skip the > > rest but if you are going for a pat on the head, I'll > > indulge you a bit more. > > That's a sleazy little trick you've picked up from Barry: > Anybody who makes a criticism that happens to be similar > to one Judy has made is only doing it to get Judy's > approval; it's not possible that two people could come > to similar conclusions independently.
Mastering a little inadvertent irony are we? Therefore there's > really only *one* person who makes that criticism, so > it can be considered an outlier, an anomaly, and dismissed > without consideration. > > Oh, and never, *ever* look to see whether Judy seems to be > into the point-awarding, head-patting game with the person > whose criticism you're claiming has been made to gain her > approval. That wouldn't be necessary for the point to be valid about the other person. > > BTW, to Ravi: This isn't a "new" Curtis Avatar, not by a > long shot. He just happens to have been working overtime > on it recently. > > <snip> > > > Sure Judy and Nabby > > > come against each of you guys persistently and strongly > > > but they do have a point that neither of you seem to > > > acknowledge, at least publicly. > > > > You are rambling a bit here. I acknowledge Judy all the > > time, what point do you mean? > > As if you didn't know. > > Jeez, Curtis, did you set out to demonstrate the validity > of the charge that your ethics are, well, a bit slippery? I wanted him to state it clearly rather than play the innuendo game of vague unpleasant shaming. But my ethics are just fine, thanks for asking. > > <snip> > > I have a sneaking suspicion that you needed some attention > > from me and were willing to get it in its positive or > > negative form. > > Ah, another sleazy move borrowed from Barry. No wonder you > refuse to criticize him. Judy just few lines above: <it's not possible that two people could come > to similar conclusions independently. > You hardly even give me a chance to write when you hand me all the best lines yourself. >
