--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > She's already been "forgiven" on numerous occaisions. > > Others, less so. > > The sad thing is, "fag hags" like our dear Broom Hilda, will appeal to > sensitive men's feminine sides. So they fall prey.
I think I just got called gay on FFL! If what you say is true and she has been forgiven in the past, I see your point and Bhairitu's too. Anything that causes Rick and Alex hassles needs to be avoided. I withdraw my point but maintain my strictly hetero-sensitivity as a badge I earned in the 70's when I got that haircut with the layers and the feathering. I ran that till I found out how many more women the bad boys were gett'n. But seriously to repair this insinuation (not that there is anything wrong with it) I am furious about that sports team who traded that huge man to that other sports team because now my favored club will have less of a chance for the playoff tournament contest involving a lot of beer and babes in bikinis as well as a license to turn over cars in my neighborhood and set them on fire to express my displeasure at the outcome of said tournament. That is how manly I am. Plus I am going to eat a steak for dinner because I love having huge meat in my mouth. Wait, that didn't come out right... > > > On Jul 29, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Bhairitu wrote: > > > On 07/29/2011 03:44 PM, Vaj wrote: > > > On Jul 29, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Alex Stanley wrote: > > > > > >> How can it be considered covering up, when there's nothing the least bit > > >> secretive about deleting posts? Admins have a bit more specific info > > >> about deletions, but anybody can see that deletions occurred, and > > >> anybody can look at the alternate archive and figure out what was > > >> deleted. It makes no sense to accuse Judy of trying to hide her > > >> overposting when there's simply no possible way to hide the overposting > > >> or the deletions. There's also the fact that she emailed me to tell me > > >> what had happened. I see no dishonesty or deception in any of her > > >> actions. > > > > > > Judy has over-posted on numerous occasions. When she doesn't, she posts > > > out at exactly 50 posts - as if she was totally obsessed with posting. > > > > > > In fact, the reason posting limits were set was BECAUSE OF JUDY (and > > > Lawson). SO the entire list has been held hostage because of these two > > > posters. But really, Judy is the main culprit. Lawson had his own issues > > > and has worked on them to the point where he seems to have those > > > compulsions under control. > > > > > > I myself routinely underpost. > > > > > > But on the occasions where I have just lightly over-posted by Yahoo! not > > > sending a post or two or three to me, I was immediately banned, despite > > > any protest. > > > > > > At this point, since public flogging is no longer in fashion, I think > > > Judy should be both banned and flogged on YouTube. > > > > And we know what will happen if she is forgiven: from then on Rick and > > Alex will be bugged by people who "accidentally" overpost. > > > She's already been "forgiven" on numerous occaisions. > > Others, less so. > > The sad thing is, "fag hags" like our dear Broom Hilda, will appeal to > sensitive men's feminine sides. So they fall prey. >
