Sounds like you are jealous Vaj. perhaps you should try dressing in drag, and we'll be more lenient on the posting limits.
--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Jul 29, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Alex Stanley wrote: > > > How can it be considered covering up, when there's nothing the least bit > > secretive about deleting posts? Admins have a bit more specific info about > > deletions, but anybody can see that deletions occurred, and anybody can > > look at the alternate archive and figure out what was deleted. It makes no > > sense to accuse Judy of trying to hide her overposting when there's simply > > no possible way to hide the overposting or the deletions. There's also the > > fact that she emailed me to tell me what had happened. I see no dishonesty > > or deception in any of her actions. > > > Judy has over-posted on numerous occasions. When she doesn't, she posts out > at exactly 50 posts - as if she was totally obsessed with posting. > > In fact, the reason posting limits were set was BECAUSE OF JUDY (and Lawson). > SO the entire list has been held hostage because of these two posters. But > really, Judy is the main culprit. Lawson had his own issues and has worked on > them to the point where he seems to have those compulsions under control. > > I myself routinely underpost. > > But on the occasions where I have just lightly over-posted by Yahoo! not > sending a post or two or three to me, I was immediately banned, despite any > protest. > > At this point, since public flogging is no longer in fashion, I think Judy > should be both banned and flogged on YouTube. >
