--- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > This time around, Vaj actually attacked Alex's sexuality, > > Interesting... thinking back to last night's posts, I didn't > feel attacked by Vaj, as his posts that directly addressed me > mentioned my sexuality and jokingly asked that I post a pic > of me with a gun/dead animal. But, he did call you a "fag > hag", which means that to him, I'm just a fag.
Not only that, a fag who "falls prey" to me. Apparently I prey on gay men and coerced you into not suspending me by appealing to your "sensitive feminine side." > Nice. And, yet > another example of how my filters run on autopilot. Yup. And there was another dig as well in a different sequence of posts. I'll see if I can find it. The whole deletion thing, of course, was essentially also an attack, this one on your authority. BTW, do you remember any of what Vaj describes here? "But on the occasions where I have just lightly over-posted by Yahoo! not sending a post or two or three to me, I was immediately banned, despite any protest." Plus his claim that I'd been "forgiven [for overposting] on numerous occasions." I recall exactly two occasions, both of them accidental on my part. Does that sound right to you?
