--- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: <snip> > > Not only that, a fag who "falls prey" to me. Apparently > > I prey on gay men and coerced you into not suspending me > > by appealing to your "sensitive feminine side." > > Buncha bizarro world psychobabble, IMO. I was trying to do > what's fair, but the system as it was was messy and human > and full of situational variability. As fair as I tried to > be, enforcement would always be prone to inconsistency.
Of course it's psychobabble. Of course you were trying to do what's fair. And of course there would always be some inconsistency despite your best efforts. But jeez, we ought to be able to live with that given your obviously good intentions and sense of fairness. If you were an unpredictable, arbitrary tyrant whom we didn't trust, it would be something else again, but you aren't. > Equally ridiculous is the notion that I like to show off my > oh so immense power around here in order to appear butch. If > that really were the case, I would absolutely relish every > overposting as an opportunity. Heh. That would be fun to see, though. <snip> > > BTW, do you remember any of what Vaj describes here? > > > > "But on the occasions where I have just lightly over-posted > > by Yahoo! not sending a post or two or three to me, I was > > immediately banned, despite any protest." > > Sorry, I have no recollection of that. Yeah, I don't either. > > Plus his claim that I'd been "forgiven [for overposting] > > on numerous occasions." I recall exactly two occasions, > > both of them accidental on my part. Does that sound right > > to you? > > Again, no recollection. Well, that I'm pretty sure of.
