On 09/15/2011 05:09 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> ...is a laugh track. You know, that canned laughter that they used to
> insert into TV sitcoms. The outbursts of cleared pre-recorded laughter
> never really gave the impression that the show was being filmed in front
> of a live audience, because even an idiot could tell it was canned. It
> always seemed to me more designed to tell the audience what parts of the
> show were supposed to be funny (even if they weren't), and thus when
> they should laugh at home. It was like remedial education for the
> laugh-impaired.
>
> I always wanted to take a really terrible episode of one of those shows
> and re-edit it, putting the laugh tracks in completely different places.
> Instead of inserting them after the punchline of a bad joke, I'd throw
> them in when there was an outbreak of bad acting. Or really lame
> dialogue. Or in completely inappropriate moments, as in this clip from
> Pulp Fiction:
>
> http://www.dula.tv/watch.php?file=pulp-fiction-with-a-laugh-track.flv
> <%20http://www.dula.tv/watch.php?file=pulp-fiction-with-a-laugh-track.fl\
> v>
>
> That's what FFL needs in my opinion, a laugh track. It's gotten so
> serious around here lately, what with all the politics and the ad
> hominem and the posturing and the self defensiveness. I think adding a
> laugh track would be just the ticket.
>
> As I imagine it, the outbursts of canned laughter would occur at random
> intervals. You'd be in the middle of reading some heavy conspiracy
> theory or political screed, and suddenly there would be the sound of
> laughter, as if some astral audience reading over your shoulder had just
> cracked up. Or you'd be reading someone's oh-so-earnest attempt to sell
> you a "right" belief of fix one of your "wrong" ones, and again the
> laugh track would go off. According to my theory, the random outbursts
> of laughter would remind the readers that it was OK *to* laugh at random
> outbursts of seriousness, and at themselves for ever taking them
> seriously. As a result, goes my theory, there would be fewer serious
> replies, as fewer people got their buttons all pushed.
>
> How 'bout it, Bhairitu, or the other programmers here? Can you whip up
> an app that lives in the background as you're reading or writing to FFL
> that randomly laughs at you from time to time? I think it would be a
> useful utility.  :-)

FFL is *just* a chat group and hardly worth such efforts.  It's really 
*not* that important in my daily life.  It's more like a corner bar you 
drop into now and then or a water cooler at a very *freaky* company.

I only did the Post Count utility because Thunderbird unlike "LookOut!" 
(Microsoft insider name for Outlook) couldn't give me a count of my 
posts though Thunderbird NOW has that capability.   It started as a C 
utility and I rewrote it in PHP because of PHP has a class to handle 
mailbox files and headers (latter all that is needed for a post count).

Fact is, I don't need a laugh track because I am usually laughing as I 
post something to FFL. ;-)

BUT, I've always thought *this* should be the theme song for FFL: :-D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5znh58WITU8


Reply via email to