I think the whole point was the Turq, whether he has a life or not and maybe 
should get one, pointed out the post Mr. Buck H was complaining about was a 
clip from a David Lynch film he had posted. 
The fact that the Yin dude ( the mime of photos of art) posted a picture of a 
fictional painting of a Priest holding the breast of a Nun, that appeared to 
send Mr. Buck into a spontaneous wet dream.. LOL
and wished to see the moderators monitor the board a little more. 
So who's art will it be that gets suspended? Anything David Lynch has created 
will be allowed. Anyone else's are, be it may, fiction, should  be sent to the 
trash pile?   I think naught!  LOL

You dudes crack me up. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@...> wrote:
>
> You may want to be aware that David Lynch makes movies that are *fiction*, 
> and when a *fiction* movie is made, anybody can play any of the parts, or be 
> cast as any of the characters, because it is *fiction*. However, since the 
> story you have of your life Turq, is *fiction*, perhaps that makes it really 
> difficult for you to tell the difference between what is *real*, and what is 
> *fiction*. My suggestion? Get out more. There's an entire *real* world out 
> there, with *real* people and *real* events. Learn to tell the difference.:-)
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > ROTHFLMAO!   
> > > I noticed  Hahahahahahahahaha! 
> > 
> > Thanks for getting it. Barcelona humor. :-)
> > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlwlXf5Tnq0 This one is pretty 
> > > clean dedicated to Nabby : ) (because of the Aliens.)
> > 
> > Seriously, one of the reasons I think Nabby consistently
> > defends David Lynch is that his example proves that Nabby
> > is not the most out-there TB TMer in the world. 
> > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > As like that last Youtube thing Turqb posted was completely 
> > > > ? un-called for and un-needed in the flow of what was a thoughtful 
> > > > > and uplifting spiritual conversation. I wish the list moderators 
> > > > > here would do a better job of screening the members and what 
> > > > > gets published here.  
> > > > 
> > > > Does anyone else get the feeling that "Buck" is so
> > > > out of it that he doesn't even realize that the clip
> > > > I posted is from one of David Lynch's (the TMO's "most
> > > > spiritual person," since he is literally the only one
> > > > promoting TM at this point) movies? 
> > > > 
> > > > "Buck" made the point of saying that he hoped that the
> > > > poor, depraved Rhianna could be "saved" by David Lynch.
> > > > I merely posted a clip showing how thoroughly that the
> > > > current TMO Poster Boy saved the virtue and the image
> > > > of *his own wife* in that film.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm thinkin' that if there is anyone trying to drag the
> > > > flow of spiritual conversation down to a new low, it's
> > > > the organization that would promote David Lynch as a 
> > > > role model.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to