...I didnt feel the need to wait to be invited to voice my opinion, at least I ain't charging for it and I'm sure you can delete anything you dont like. It was lovely to get such a welcomed response to my first post, thanks for teaching me more about love and tolerance!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Russell" <russellca12@> wrote: > > > > sage Body > > > > > > > > > > I find the whole issue of copyrighting mantras unhealthy....who has the > > right to claim ownership of what are (if they are what they are claimed to > > be) spiritual truths. > > > > The integrity and value of the 'spiritual product' gets undermined and even > > diminishes once you exclude access to to all humanity by putting a cost to > > it. > > > > > > > > Organisations that put a financial costing to a product will always find it > > difficult to not let power/prestige/property interfere with, in this case, > > their spiritual aim. If there are legitimate running costs then how about > > trusting those that benefit from the products 'spiritual enlightenment' and > > then choose to support the organisation through voluntary contributions to > > allow their fellow man/woman to have the same experience. > > > > Money up front spirituality kinda sucks of exclusivity...excluding > > others,....spiritual???? > > > Definately. > Who asked for your opinion anyway ? >
