I appreciate your comment. No need for me to delete the opinion.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Russell" <russellca12@...> wrote:
>
> ...I didnt feel the need to wait to be invited to voice my opinion, at least
> I ain't charging for it and I'm sure you can delete anything you dont like.
> It was lovely to get such a welcomed response to my first post, thanks for
> teaching me more about love and tolerance!
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Russell" <russellca12@> wrote:
> > >
> > > sage Body
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I find the whole issue of copyrighting mantras unhealthy....who has the
> > > right to claim ownership of what are (if they are what they are claimed
> > > to be) spiritual truths.
> > >
> > > The integrity and value of the 'spiritual product' gets undermined and
> > > even diminishes once you exclude access to to all humanity by putting a
> > > cost to it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Organisations that put a financial costing to a product will always find
> > > it difficult to not let power/prestige/property interfere with, in this
> > > case, their spiritual aim. If there are legitimate running costs then how
> > > about trusting those that benefit from the products 'spiritual
> > > enlightenment' and then choose to support the organisation through
> > > voluntary contributions to allow their fellow man/woman to have the same
> > > experience.
> > >
> > > Money up front spirituality kinda sucks of exclusivity...excluding
> > > others,....spiritual????
> >
> >
> > Definately.
> > Who asked for your opinion anyway ?
> >
>
