Denise - I meant FFL.

Bravo - Spoken like a true liberal :-)

Love MLK but Ammachi is scary.

Love Dolly Lama but MMY is scary.

Love Gandhi but Osho's scary.

Love ya.

On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Denise Evans <[email protected]> wrote:

> <snip>
> "This list is a great collection of people who ran away from conflict, from 
> the Guru, from the beloved."
> 
> What list?  Obaji's list?  In my case, I would say ran away "screaming"  Of 
> course, if you knew me before in work mode..."running away from conflict" was 
> not my MO at all.  But, I learned through getting beat to crap, that in 
> general, and depending on one's position on the org chart, conflict avoiders 
> do substantially better than those who address and acknowledge that conflict 
> exists and try to resolve it.  Resolution often requires accountability, 
> which is often in short supply in the work environment.    
> 
> Btw, I appreciated being characterized as "fun."  Maybe part of my being is 
> starting to enjoy herself.  
> 
> And yes, MLK did a lot of spiritual good for this country.
> 
> From: Ravi Yogi <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 1:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Last chance to enter the "FFF Suck-Up Fest" 
> contest
> 
>  
> Indeed, it was my honest assessment on Barry.
> 
> He ran away from TM, ran away from Rama, ran away from conflict.
> 
> That's why love, faith, trust were advised, not to be subservient but when 
> conflict arose you stuck around out of love for the master, for the beloved. 
> A great benediction would then have happened. 
> 
> This list is a great collection of people who ran away from conflict, from 
> the Guru, from the beloved.
> 
> Now they project this conflict on to admiration for pseudo spiritual icons 
> like Gandhi, MLK and Dolly Lama.
> 
> What a shame !!!
> 
> 
> On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:52 PM, "whynotnow7" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Ha-Ha! Excellent!
>> 
>> --- In [email protected], Ravi Yogi <raviyogi@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Great stuff Barry..
>> > 
>> > But your spiritual guide forgot or you forgot one important step..
>> > 
>> > Yes conflict is great for growth and a good spiritual guide creates 
>> > conflict to create growth, that's what ashrams were all about.
>> > 
>> > However you create conflict, you push buttons but you walk away from it at 
>> > the first sign of discomfort. Only a person who has encountered his 
>> > shadow, healed and transformed it can then use conflict on others.
>> > 
>> > I humbly say you are not there yet.
>> > 
>> > But I am..
>> > 
>> > On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:39 AM, turquoiseb <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > 
>> > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Turq, I really enjoy your honesty. You are a very loving 
>> > > > being who champions the wit of 
>> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus
>> > > > One day, I hope Raja Hagelin will give you a crown to lead 
>> > > Aleksa Palladinothe aspect of creating a blend of reality to 
>> > > Aleksa Palladinothe movement, Raja Turq.
>> > > 
>> > > I'll pass on the crown, thanks. 
>> > > 
>> > > As you've obviously figured out, this was just 
>> > > a troll post, to tweak a few people here and 
>> > > see how they react. 
>> > > 
>> > > It's based on a bit of spiritual wisdom taught
>> > > to me before I turned 20 by the guy who taught
>> > > me how to play pool for money. I had spent my
>> > > first year in college developing and honing my 
>> > > skills as a pool player, but before I met him 
>> > > I didn't know squat about playing for money. 
>> > > After I met him, and after I started to pay 
>> > > attention to what he taught me, I managed to
>> > > pay for much of the rest of my education by
>> > > paying pool, so I still put some stock in his
>> > > advice.
>> > > 
>> > > One of the best pieces of advice he ever gave
>> > > me had to do with how to spot the "mark" in a 
>> > > room full of pool players. He taught me to 
>> > > "watch the banter." In his view, it was *not*
>> > > just idle chatter people exchanged between shots.
>> > > It was invaluable information that could be used
>> > > to determine which players around the table were 
>> > > the most likely "marks" and who were just fellow
>> > > hustlers like myself. 
>> > > 
>> > > His basic advice was this: "Look for flattery,
>> > > and who uses it. Who compliments the other players
>> > > on their shots, or on other aspects of the way 
>> > > they carry themselves? Those are the other hustlers;
>> > > you don't want to waste your time playing them. Who
>> > > you want to identify are the people who *fall* for
>> > > the flattery, and can't seem to get enough of it.
>> > > Those are the marks. Once you've identified them,
>> > > the only challenge left is to figure out how much
>> > > money they have on them, so you can take almost
>> > > all of it. Everything except for cab fare home.
>> > > If you leave them that, they'll be back the next
>> > > night, ready to be fleeced again." 
>> > > 
>> > > Truer words have never been spoken by any spiritual
>> > > teacher I've subsequently met in this life. They
>> > > always *were* back the next night, ready to be 
>> > > taken to the cleaners again, and of course that
>> > > is what happened.
>> > > 
>> > > I submit that my mentor's advice can be equally
>> > > applied to Internet forums like Fairfield Life.
>> > > 
>> > > > Judy already knows I appreciate her, so no need to suck up. : )
>> > > > 
>> > > > Denise is fun.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Bob Price is well, uh, trying his best.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Ravi is the ancient's wisdom.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Curtis is the blue sapphire on consistency.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Robin..I am still learning to understand, which one is he?
>> > > > 
>> > > > Nabby, his gracious cornfed soy jerky.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Whynotknow, to place where it belongs.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Archer, the bow.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Cardmaister, seventhray1, merlin and Vag and anyone else in this 
>> > > > category who I may have missed, a golden ray of hope.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Bharitu, wisdom.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Raunchydog, a challenge.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Mark Landau, much deeper than appears. 
>> > > > 
>> > > > FFLpostcount, all those who fit into the numbers game.
>> > > > 
>> > > > I love you all. OXO
>> > > 
>> > > Who will respond to all of this, and who not? If my
>> > > mentor's theory is true, that should tell you a lot. :-)
>> > > 
>> > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Remember, this week marks the end of the recent contest
>> > > > > in which FFL denizens were expected to reverse themselves
>> > > > > and flatter the hell out of others here in an attempt to
>> > > > > suck up to them. 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > The contest has been a smashing success so far. As its
>> > > > > sponsors figured, there has been such a lack of obvious
>> > > > > sucking up here in the past that many were desperate for 
>> > > > > it. As a result, many recipients of recent suck-up posts 
>> > > > > have gone out of their way with their "Gosh...oh shucks...
>> > > > > I don't deserve it" replies. In some cases it was almost 
>> > > > > as if they believed what was said. 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Great theater all around. I applaud everyone's efforts, 
>> > > > > and remind you that you've got a few more days to get 
>> > > > > your own suck-up entry posted. Awards will be given out
>> > > > > for both the best apology/suck-up post and the best 
>> > > > > mock-humble acceptance speech post next Saturday.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > :-)
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > For the record, I'm not playing. If I said it about you
>> > > > > in the past, I meant it. *Someone* on this forum should
>> > > > > at least be consistent. :-)
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > 
>> > >
>> >
>> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to