Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimological Aspects - Which is Maharishi?

[Llundrub]

One apparently cannot determine the state of consciousness of another from their actions; probably given the observer/observed uncertainty one can never adequately determine the state of consciousness of another, if one is not functioning at least from Brahman and willing to completely "be" the other, or know the other as oneself. Even in Unity there is room for inaccuracy, as one is in U.C. still potentially perceiving from the POV of an unchallenged or "unslain" small-self. Only in Brahman is one aware of the spatio-temporal ("impermanent") and egoic nature of all the standard seven SoC (and thus sees that there is no real difference between "ignorance" and "enlightenment"), and even in Brahman one is or may be functioning through a "resurrected" small-self, which itself still may be quite capable of inaccurate perception-filters and so on.  :-) ----I think that you're confused.  I think we can -only- determine the state of conscious of someone by their actions, and I think that overreaching is the specific quality of the ignorant which determines that they are in fact not in Brahmin.    In the cases of the Mahabharata and Ramayana the villians are always those that overreach. Such is also the case in many other tracts. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' SPONSORED LINKS Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.