|
It seems to me that all *anyone* does who speaks of the unspeakable, is "reifying some errant conceptuality," and yet I enjoyed reading of "reifications" like these when I thought myself on a path, and I enjoy playing with these "reifications" now when there is evidently no path. No artist's self-portrait is going to be as alive as he is, nor is it going to please every critic, but so what? We still do what we do. :-) -----If you're going to reify advaita then how about making reference to actual tantras which might discuss these things, like the Todala tantra and the Dashmahavidyas which discusses the ten directional aspect of the adhiyatmika in terms of Shiva and the Ten Mahavidyas. It's interesting in terms of the directional nature of spacetime in creating matter from its own self through aprehending itself in terms of direction. It's just less personal, and thus more universal, and
thus more likely to draw more commentary then the self masturbative personal
drama with no foundation of specious conical and planary irrelevancy.
To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimological Asp... Robert Gimbel
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimol... Llundrub
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimolo... Vaj
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimologica... sparaig
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimologica... sparaig
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimologica... sparaig
