Sorry but I just don't buy the NLP story.  It just sounds like a 
ignorant "flatlander" theory.

On 11/07/2011 12:54 PM, johnt wrote:
> Since you seem to not be aware of it NLP deals extensively with sound 
> vibration known as "auditory tonal" as contrasted to "auditory digital" which 
> deals with the meaning of words. Read a little before you comment.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu<noozguru@...>  wrote:
>> The first thing any research needs to do is to learn the procedures and
>> they won't do that so they'll always be "spectators" and draw false
>> conclusions.  Shakti is simply life force, a concept beyond the ability
>> of contemporary science to understand.  One should also look into the
>> yoga of sound and understand how sound effects people, not in an NLP way
>> but a vibratory way.  It's more physics than  anything else.  Mantras
>> work due to their resonance and charged they work faster than when
>> they're not.  You'll see in books the instruction where one must repeat
>> a certain mantra 100,000 times to get results.  But that's from the book
>> and if give by a guru it may take only 100 repetitions.
>>
>> On 11/06/2011 09:22 PM, johnt wrote:
>>> No one can explain what the shakti energy is yet but they certainly agree 
>>> it can be passed on through the process known as entrainment. There is some 
>>> early research that may indicate that shakti can be seen on kirlian 
>>> photography and others can be seen being entrained by it, but it's still 
>>> early in the process of understanding.
>>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu<noozguru@>   wrote:
>>>> I'm talking about shakti which is an energy.  You should be experiencing
>>>> it when you meditate.  I can transfer that energy to someone else
>>>> without saying a word, just by touching them.  So explain that by NLP.
>>>> You can't.  They are going down the wrong road though they wouldn't be
>>>> the first researchers to do that by any means. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> On 11/06/2011 06:56 PM, johnt wrote:
>>>>> Then what is it saying. Be precise I value tradition in the sense that it 
>>>>> preserves elements that are life supporting, it doesn't tell me how it 
>>>>> works. That's what modern psychologists are only beginning to try and do 
>>>>> do. Vedic masters were masters of what's now becoming NLP, however people 
>>>>> just parroting what they heard doesn't show understanding.
>>>>>
>>>>> What exactly do YOU mean by "charged"
>>>>>
>>>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu<noozguru@>    wrote:
>>>>>> Oh yes it does.  Centuries of tantrics and yogis would argue with you on
>>>>>> that.  These guys you are talking about are blind men feeling an
>>>>>> elephant. :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/06/2011 06:00 PM, johnt wrote:
>>>>>>> "charge" is a nice ooga booga term that says nothing. It's only part of 
>>>>>>> philosophy not science unless you understand it in the sense of Rupert 
>>>>>>> sheldrake' morphic field, in which case your saying the same thing I am.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu<noozguru@>     wrote:
>>>>>>>> That's a wild ass theory trying to make the puja sound "scientific".
>>>>>>>> What the puja actually does is "charge" the mantra.  In other 
>>>>>>>> traditions
>>>>>>>> you are given the mantra by someone who has enough juice to "charge" 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> mantra with shakti without the need for a puja.  Reciting a 3-4 minute
>>>>>>>> puja takes it place.  It would have taken years to create even a small
>>>>>>>> army of TM teachers the traditional way.  The traditional way is what
>>>>>>>> Muktananda used and his instructors gave shaktipat along with the
>>>>>>>> mantra.  It is also the way my tantra teacher has instructed me to 
>>>>>>>> teach
>>>>>>>> people.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/05/2011 11:48 PM, Denise Evans wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Sheeeeeeet.  Is that what "brainwashing" is?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>> From: johnt<johnlasher20002000@>
>>>>>>>>> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2011 11:17 AM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] WHY TM CAN'T BE LEARNED FROM A BOOK
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why TM can't be learned from a book
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A TM initiation alters the brainwave pattern of the one performing 
>>>>>>>>> the puja. When the teacher then passes on the mantra to the person 
>>>>>>>>> learning meditation he also passes on a brainwave state by a process 
>>>>>>>>> know in neurophysiology as entrainment. Brainwave entrainment or 
>>>>>>>>> "brainwave synchronization," is any practice that aims to cause 
>>>>>>>>> brainwave frequencies to fall into step with a periodic stimulus 
>>>>>>>>> having a frequency corresponding to the intended brain-state. This is 
>>>>>>>>> only one of the Neuro effects of a TM initiation which is a very well 
>>>>>>>>> crafted design of several which lead to a self transcending effect of 
>>>>>>>>> the mantra.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>
>

Reply via email to