--- In [email protected], "wgm4u" <anitaoaks4u@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > I might have more sympathy with your argument if the > > police in this situation had been in any danger at all. > > I don't think they were "risking their lives," as you > > put it, or anything close to it. I think it was the > > students who were putting themselves in a potentially > > dangerous situation, given the propensity of the > > police for excessive violence. > > I think you said it yourself "you don't think they were > risking their lives" but you didn't KNOW did YOU?? You > can't run a police force under those conditions!
This is really just too hilarious. Can you *imagine* what it would be like if the police didn't dare approach a bunch of people without pepper-spraying them first, just in case one of them was deranged and had a lethal weapon? That's what BillyG is prescribing. As my mother would say, he doesn't have any more sense than a bunny rabbit. Even if ONE of the dozen or so had a knife a police officer could have been killed! > > I think YOU should have broken up that demonstration, what do you think about > that? You ought to be kissing your lucky ass we have police that are willing > to risk their lives every day for us. > > PS It isn't a given that the police "have a propensity for excessive > violence", don't know where you got that given all the arrests that take > place every day without incident. (another subject though) >
