--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> 
wrote:
>
> Wow, nothing like hearing an excellent reputation that my ass
> now has to try to live up to!  Thanks Marek!
> 
> "Untethered" is such an excellent word. I think the egging on
> has to do with the fact that some of the new posters figured
> out the social system.  If you throw mud at Barry and Vaj and
> myself, certain people will have your back.

Says Curtis, parroting one of Barry's more ridiculous
excuses, a variant of the one he borrowed yesterday.

  It was a simple
> social formula that has shielded some posters from a more
> unanimous group, WTF? In this particular context I think
> there is a callus

(callous, adj.; callus, noun) (This correction is provided
so Curtis can make a show of thanking me for it while
pointedly ignoring the rest of what I said.)

> disregard for the welfare of this person being played as a
> pawn. There is something unseemly going on in this dynamic,
> and I appreciate your speaking up.

"Do you really not understand that Ravi has actual problems
that shouldn't be speculated about on the Internet like he
is our private intellectual toy?"--Curtis to Robin, awhile
back






> 
> I have been fascinated by how far people can stretch their oft quoted 
> principles to encourage the enemy of their enemy.  It is revealing many 
> trollish agendas here.  But with kind words from some posters here, like 
> yourself, I feel as if there is another option for those who value it.  
> 
> Thanks man.
> 
>  
> --- In [email protected], "marekreavis" <reavismarek@> wrote:
> >
> > It's not my habit, at least for the last year or so, to interject my 
> > opinion into an ongoing thread, but following FFL for the last month or 
> > two, it's amazed me to observe the willingness of some folks here to 
> > glorify and encourage what, in my opinion and experience, appears to be 
> > some very untethered behavior by some of the more recent and prolific 
> > posters. 
> > 
> > And even more inexplicably, to gang up on Curtis, for attempting, in a 
> > straightforward yet still compassionate way, to engage in a reasonable 
> > exchange with, and criticism of, those individuals.
> > 
> > For what it's worth, in my estimation Curtis is a true, shining example of 
> > what I'd always hoped the TM movement to produce. There's certainly no one 
> > on this board from whom I've learned more.
> > 
> > Curtis certainly doesn't need any endorsement from me, but I felt compelled 
> > to write, regardless.


Reply via email to