Judy, I'm afraid I will take a pass on rereading the history and unfoldment of this dispute. I am not that interested. I stand by Susan's assertion that whatever bad blood has transpired between the combatants has not justified Ravi's smearing and overall abusive behavior. If you see it differently, so be it. The question I really don't care to get an answer to is just what would justify out of bounds behavior on your part.
--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > You and Susan need to start at post #300408--read it all, > including the quotes from previous posts--and then read > forward. This all began with a gratuitous slam of Ravi > from Curtis in that post, and it escalated between them > from there. > > Curtis is supposedly the reasonable one. He could have > stopped the escalation after Ravi made his accusation, > leaving Ravi twisting slowly, slowly in the wind, by > simply denying it and pointing out, as he did to me > (as though I wasn't already well aware of it), the > enormous unlikelihood that if he'd done what Ravi > claimed, it would have long since come out and been hung > around his neck. > > He chose a different course. > > As to my initial three-word intervention and what > followed, please contemplate the phrase "getting a taste > of one's own medicine." > > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ wrote: > > > > Judy, > > I am not sure I understand this. One the one hand, the big complaint > > about Curtis is that he refuses to censure Barry for the many personal > > attacks which Barry levels against many here. > > And because of this, you don't feel any compunction to rein Ravi in for > > the personal attacks he levels against many here? Or it may be that you > > feel Ravi's attacks have merit. > > Really, I would appreciate a little clarification in this regard, if you > > don't mind. > > Thanks > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > curtisdeltablues@ wrote: > > > > > > > > I appreciate your effort here Steve. With Judy doubling > > > > down in her support of this guy > > > > > > Beneath contempt, again. >
