If you actually knew me you would remember my name, so you either know me or you don't know me, "very likely" doesn't enter into it. I was not a small player. And I, unlike you, am willing to step from behind some smokescreen, tell you my name, my history and I posted a profile picture.
What you seem to be keeping "alive" is your interest, maybe even your obsession, with Robin Woodsworth Carlsen. He appears on FFL and you are all over it. You have written more words to and about this man than is normal for someone who is not harbouring some deep-seated, insatiable hunger to provoke and engage him. You are in denial if you can not admit this. Take two weeks, it will take you about that amount of time, to re-read all the words, words, words that you have volleyed his way. I see this as having kept something "alive". This "old laundry" thing, now I guarantee that if I sent you one of my old WTS tapes of big juicy confrontations, manifestations and all the other goodies that are on it, you would throw it into your VHS player (if you still had such a relic) with gusto. I agree that you "have virtually forgotten" your experience with WTS if your descriptions of the processes i.e. confrontations are any indication. "I've never been an angry person". No comment. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Jan 19, 2012, at 9:16 PM, awoelflebater wrote: > > > Perhaps we knew each other at one time? > > I'd suspect that's very likely. > > > If you are an American then for sure I would know you if you were witness > > to "many cosmic confrontations" including confronting Robin. However, when > > being confronted by him it was by default reciprocal. It was a two way > > confrontation. Like watching ping pong, back and forth, back and forth. > > True. > > > I am also not quite sure of your motivation for keeping all of this alive > > for 25 years. > > Keeping all what alive? > > This is old laundry. Not very interesting at all. Except for voyeurs who like > to watch such things as people tossing old stuff. > > > For you to do so it must have been a very traumatic experience. I can > > understand that. > > It was not a traumatic experience for me in the least. I had a great time. > But it's something virtually forgotten...and like old laundry, not worth > devoting too much time to. Being asked to sort thru my old laundry for > interesting pieces is what seems odd to me. If some of that old laundry > involves people I cared for, I'm even less likely to hang it out to dry. > > You on the other hand seem happy to talk about it. And that's fine too. > > > What I can not quite understand is the need to carry it for so long. > > But then your description of a confrontation on the "stage" sounds like > > someone who has either never been there, has a faulty memory or is fishing > > to find out if I am the real thing. Either way I am happy to answer your > > questions but hopefully you are wanting them answered in order to close the > > book on your anger. > > I've never been an angry person, so again, I'm not sure what you're talking > about. > > My last experience with Robin - or Robindra as I often refer to him - was one > always recalled as a moment of hilarity. It's virtually impossible for any of > those present to keep from falling into laughter. >
