On 04/12/2012 04:52 PM, sparaig wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu<noozguru@...> wrote: >> On 04/12/2012 10:49 AM, sparaig wrote: >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister<no_reply@> wrote: >>>> >>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"<LEnglish5@> wrote: >>>>> Has anyone ever found that they are solving a puzzle or math problem or >>>>> planning their day, etc., during their TM period? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It struck me just now that what is taught concerning this particular >>>>> situation epitomizes the difference between TM and not-TM. >>>>> >>>>> L. >>>>> >>>> My wild guess is that's the vicaara (vichAra) stage(?) of saMprajnaata >>>> samaadhi. I also quite often come up with some "ingenious" >>>> solutions of various problems, and stuff! >>>> >>> Not my point. My point is: >>> >>> >>>> It struck me just now that what is taught concerning this particular >>>> situation >>> epitomizes the difference between TM and not-TM. >> The problem is your original statement is ambiguous. I asked for >> clarification of what you meant and you just said "sigh." I guess we're >> all not as psychic as you so we don't have to guess about what you >> mean. I would also say if you made as ambiguous a statement in a >> project meeting of programmers you would get skewered because of the >> ambiguity. >> >> Most mantra meditations teach that if you have a thought during >> meditation to just return to the mantra. > > But that's not the complete response for TM, now is it? > > > L.
There you go again. What do you mean by "complete response"? That's ambiguous. What I said is certainly the gist of it. Meditation, even the TM kind, isn't all that technical.
