--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Apr 13, 2012, at 1:25 AM, sparaig wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > My point is that its not an either/or, or more importantly, > > that ease is the guideline rather than some specific goal. > > > > > > > > > > > > L. > > > > > > > > > > Good point, Lawson. In TM ease is the process. There is no goal. > > In non-TM is the goal ease? > > > > > > > The instruction Bhairatu gave was "go back to thinking the mantra" > > as though the details of the TM checking didn't matter. > > > > ANd of course, there's nothing wrong with thinking the mantra AND > > solving problems/planning/etc if that happens to be the way your > > mind is working at that moment. > > > No nirodha for you then. >
Bullshit!? You seem to think 'citta-vRtti-nirodha' applies only to 'asaMprajnaata-samaadhi'?!