On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:02 PM, turquoiseb wrote: > No Lawson, not at all. I saw Vaj's language as what > I believe it was, the suggestion of a far greater > failing.
Precisely my point.
On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:02 PM, turquoiseb wrote: > No Lawson, not at all. I saw Vaj's language as what > I believe it was, the suggestion of a far greater > failing.
Precisely my point.