--- In [email protected], "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Judy, stop!  Find something worthier to think about. Solve some 
big 
> philosophical problem for us by using your intellectual gift for 
fine 
> discrimination. Don't waste it on nonsense. You and Turquoise are
> like an old 
> unhappily married couple who for some reason will not seek a 
divorce.
> I'm 
> wondering if we should ask Grand Wizard Rick Archer to impose some 
kind
> of temporary
> restraining order on you guys. Something along the lines of
> "authfriend and 
> Turquoise are not permitted to respond either directly or 
indirectly
> to each 
> other's posts for a period of 14 days after such posts appear." 





Nah.

Let the marketplace determine their fate.




> 
> -- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > It's possible your memory has conflated articles
> > > > > > about Girl Scouts getting college scholarships, on
> > > > > > the one hand, and Girl Scouts selling cookies, on
> > > > > > the other.  Or perhaps there were articles that
> > > > > > mentioned both, but again, without connecting the
> > > > > > two.
> > > > > 
> > > > > And, given your history of wanting to prove me
> > > > > wrong, in any circumtance possible, about the
> > > > > tiniest of tiny nitpicks, it's possible that the 
> > > > > dozen or so sites you "spot checked" out of the 
> > > > > 6690 just weren't the right ones.  Get back to 
> > > > > me after you've checked them all, Ok?  :-)
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, no, you made the claim, then supplied
> > > > the purported documentation as "proof" of that
> > > > claim, so you get to find the "right ones" if
> > > > you want them found.
> > > 
> > > Ahem.  Let us drift back to the *start* of this
> > > whole gulag in a girl scout troop and remember
> > > the post that we're talking about.  I posted a
> > > thing we call in the writing business a JOKE:
> > > 
> > > >> The real secret of the girl scout cookie drive
> > > >> success is that it's a contest -- the girls are
> > > >> earning college money for selling the most cookies, 
> > > >> that sorta thang.  So to really make it a success, 
> > > >> you'd have to come up with some sort of TM contest.
> > > >> 
> > > >> Maybe the "poor" recerts could earn their way to
> > > >> Raja status.  "Bring in 108 new initiates and 
> > > >> earn your robe!  Bring in 300 and get the crown
> > > >> that goes with it."
> > > 
> > > Because I know you're not familiar with the concept,
> > > a JOKE is a thing you're supposed to laugh at, and
> > > in this case, use to laugh at the TM movement, which
> > > sorely needs it.  You had to go and turn it into some
> > > kind of inquisition.  Go figure.
> > 
> > As you usually do when you find yourself on the
> > wrong end of a dispute, you misrepresent what 
> > happened.  It's never clear with you whether you
> > genuinely don't remember what happened and make
> > stuff up to fill in the blanks to your own
> > advantage, or whether your misrepresentations are
> > deliberate.
> > 
> > There was no inquisition of *any* kind on my part,
> > not at the start nor at any time throughout the
> > entire exchange.  In fact, in two of my posts I
> > agreed with you, in one case defending what you
> > had said against a challenge by someone else.
> > 
> > Our exchange got ugly only after I had pointed out
> > that the Google search you had come up with in
> > response to the other person's challenge didn't
> > show what you wanted it to show.  (You had
> > already gotten ugly with the other person for
> > having dared to challenge you.)
> > 
> > You don't like to be challenged, Barry.  You almost
> > invariably get ugly when that happens, especially
> > when you're in the wrong.
> > 
> > <snip>
> > > And YOU should have laughed.
> > 
> > And how do you know I didn't?  Are you so insecure
> > about whether you've managed to be funny that you
> > need to see a big HAHAHAHAHAHA?
> > 
> > > Or gotten offended 
> > > about me poking fun at the Recerts and their door-
> > > to-door initiation drive.
> > 
> > I *should* have gotten offended??  Why on earth
> > would you think I'd have reason to be offended?
> > 
> > > Instead you focused on
> > > the nitpick of all nitpicks, Girl Scout Cookies.
> > 
> > No, I didn't "focus" on it.  I merely pointed out,
> > very briefly, that the Girl Scouts didn't operate
> > the way you said.  And you agreed, saying the contests
> > you remembered might have been locally sponsored.
> > 
> > Then I posted a little essay on how the Girl Scouts
> > ran the cookie drive, because I thought *it* might
> > be a good model for the TMO.  No "nitpicking" there
> > either, just a constructive suggestion for the TMO.
> > 
> > If there was any preoccupation with nits, it was
> > yours, in feeling you had to defend yourself from
> > the other person's challenge, and then from *my*
> > challenge to the bogus Google search you had cited
> > in defending yourself from the first challenge.
> > 
> > <snip>
> > > I have nothing at stake in this silly non-sequitur,
> > > Judy.  I know what I read.  If YOU want to flog the
> > > non-sequitur, and in public no less, go right ahead.  :-)
> > 
> > Actually, as noted, you're the one flogging it.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to