I didn't mean this in a derogatory way at all; 
   After thinking this matter over...
 
  I just think Maharishi wants things a certain way and that is the 
end of it.

Even though he is enlightened, and a profound teacher, he still has 
his personality, and that is that.

I believe anyone in Bevan's or John's position right now, would be 
the same, in Maharishi's presence, because at this stage, he really 
doesn't need to prove anything to anybody.

If he truly, in his heart, is a monk and a recluse, by this time in 
his life, he has earned the right to hold any vision of the world he 
wishes and so desires.

He really dosen't need to answer to anyone, and he is probably 
getting tired of all of the nonense.



> > --- In [email protected], "Robert Gimbel" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why do you suppose, Maharishi chose Bevan and John to 
represent 
> him?
> > > 
> > > Do ya thunk, that it might just be because;
> > > 
> > > They would never challenge him, under any circumstances?
> > 
> > Bevan, certainly.  Hagelin, I'm not so sure.
> > 
> > As far as I'm aware, Bevan has never been anything
> > but MMY's acolyte, never had any major projects of
> > his own (I guess he was president of MUM for some
> > years, but that's about it).
> 
> Bevan can be very strong-willed in private with MMY from what I've 
> gathered over the years. HOWEVER, these past few years, MMY has 
been 
> unyielding on quite a few things and Bevan certainly follows what 
MMY 
> says without question, once the "are you sures?" have been 
dispensed 
> with.
> 
> > 
> > Haglin has had quite a bit of independence and many
> > significant projects "out in the world" in which he's
> > had to make his own decisions and run his own show;
> > plus which, he had a life prior to TM and still has
> > considerable expertise in a non-TM field.
> > 
> > Whether that means Hagelin is capable of challenging
> > MMY, I have no idea, but I wouldn't dismiss the
> > possibility out of hand.
> > 
> > (Didn't he keep going with the Natural Law Party for
> > awhile after MMY had ordered its abandonment?)
> > 
> > Then again, if he's nothing more than MMY's
> > creature, it means his comment about the
> > possibility of change after MMY's death must have
> > come *from MMY*.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to