There are two Barrys in this thread. I think you were responding to Bhairitu with criticism mostly meant for turquoiseb.
L. --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > > > > ROTFL! Anyone reading your posts know you're an asshole and > > > a fool and have been for years. We put up with you and mostly > > > ignore you. > > > > I haven't been following whatever it is you're responding > > to, but I would suggest that the only problem with your > > comment above is the word "mostly." > > Really? Because not even you manage to ignore me completely > (the post I'm responding to being obvious evidence of that > fact). > > Why Barry is so oblivious to his frequent self-contradictions > is a mystery. For example, in addition to the one above, he > has for *years* been trying to promote the notions that (a) > nobody pays any attention to me and (b) nobody *should* pay > attention to me because I never say anything of any > consequence. If (a) were the case, why would he even need (b)? > (And if he were ignoring me as he claims, how would he know?) > > Of course, (a) is *not* the case, and when he's not > attempting to convince folks who know better of its truth, > he's attributing to me the power to induce many participants > here to join my purportedly anti-TM-critic cause and direct > them to engage in character assassination and demonization > of innocent, well-meaning TM critics like himself and Vaj > and Curtis. Not sure how I could manage that if everyone > were ignoring me. > > Well, Barry's often claimed that it's a sign of spiritual > development to be able to hold two contradictory ideas in > the mind at once. Perhaps that's the solution to the mystery. >
