--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote:
>
> On 05/25/2012 01:15 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> > 
> > I haven't been following whatever it is you're responding
> > to, but I would suggest that the only problem with your
> > comment above is the word "mostly."
> >
> > I'm reminded of advice I was given when I first moved to
> > New York on how to deal with bag ladies and shopping cart
> > crazies on the street. A long-time native told me, "Sure,
> > they'll scream at you as you pass and try to get you to
> > respond to them, but for your sake and theirs, don't. The
> > best approach is to treat them as if they don't exist,
> > because that's what they fear most. They're afraid that
> > they're invisible and that nothing they say or do matters
> > or affects the people around them. Remind them that this
> > is true and eventually they'll quiet down leave you alone."
> >
> > The guy had a point. As he explained, the problem with
> > "mostly" is that random partial reinforcement serves only
> > to *encourage* bad behavior in humans, the same way it
> > does in dogs or other animals. Consistency is the key.
> 
> I call these posts a "gambit" as it is mainly putting 
> yourself out to expose behavior of other posters. Whatever 
> they say about me is line on water. The important thing is 
> exposing THEIR behavior. ;-)

I understand. But then, I've always believed that 
those who feel compelled to answer everything they
perceive as a slight against them are the pawns of 
those they lash out against. Those who tend to
perceive almost *everything* as a slight against 
them, even more so. 



Reply via email to