> > --- "Jason" <jedi_spock@> wrote: > <snip> > > > > I now get a feeling that he tries to hide his illogical > > points tucked inside inside his voluminious post and further > > tries to hide it behind rare bombastic words. > --- "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > Did you have trouble understanding what he wrote that > you quote, Jason? > > > --- "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote: > > > > > > If Maharishi posted something on FFL at, I say, at the > > > height of his powers and influence and prestige *we would > > > recognize that this poster—even if we didn't know who he > > > was was, in his discussion and analysis of enlightenment, > > > providing the most potent metaphysical subtext of anyone > > > posting on FFL*. > > > > > > Well, then, I had better realize this, shouldn't I, else > > > my irony sensibiity has atrophied something serious since > > > I gave up this enlightenment business. > --- "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > Oops, Jason, you didn't note that you made a big snip > between the above two paragraphs. That's a no-no. > > > --- "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote: > > > > > > > > But more than this, it is not the intelligence which > > > > created the universe which has created this state of > > > > consciousness; nor does the intelligence which created > > > > the universe have anything to do with the actions of the > > > > enlightened person I mean in the sense of being the > > > > direct and specific cause of those actions, In this > > > > sense the "cosmic" in cosmic consciousness is not cosmic > > > > at all. It certainly is a metaphysical power, and > > > > perhaps even is being controlled by very powerful > > > > intelligences; but those intelligences would be > > > > Maharishi's Vedic gods, or personal gods, or "impulses > > > > of creative intelligence". >
He contradicts himself again and again. He now states that 'the intelligence which created the universe, has nothing to do with the actions of an enlightened person.' Read it youself above.
