--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" <jedi_spock@...> wrote:
>
> 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---  "Jason" <jedi_spock@> wrote:
> > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I now get a feeling that he tries to hide his illogical 
> > > > > > points tucked inside inside his voluminious post and further 
> > > > > > tries to hide it behind rare bombastic words.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > ---  "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you have trouble understanding what he wrote that
> > > > > you quote, Jason?
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > --- "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If Maharishi posted something on FFL at, I say, at the 
> > > > > > > height of his powers and influence and prestige *we would 
> > > > > > > recognize that this poster—even if we didn't know who he 
> > > > > > > was was, in his discussion and analysis of enlightenment, 
> > > > > > > providing the most potent metaphysical subtext of anyone 
> > > > > > > posting on FFL*.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Well, then, I had better realize this, shouldn't I, else 
> > > > > > > my irony sensibiity has atrophied something serious since 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > ---  "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oops, Jason, you didn't note that you made a big snip
> > > > > > between the above two paragraphs. That's a no-no.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > --- "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote:
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > But more than this, it is not the intelligence which 
> > > > > > > created the universe which has created this state of 
> > > > > > > consciousness; nor does the intelligence which created 
> > > > > > > the universe have anything to do with the actions of the 
> > > > > > > enlightened person I mean in the sense of being the 
> > > > > > > direct and specific cause of those actions, In this 
> > > > > > > sense the "cosmic" in cosmic consciousness is not cosmic 
> > > > > > > at all. It certainly is a metaphysical power, and 
> > > > > > > perhaps even is being controlled by very powerful 
> > > > > > > intelligences; but those intelligences would be 
> > > > > > > Maharishi's Vedic gods, or personal gods, or "impulses 
> > > > > > > of creative intelligence".
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > ---  "Jason" <jedi_spock@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > He contradicts himself again and again.  He now states that 
> > > > > 'the intelligence which created the universe, has nothing to 
> > > > > do with the actions of an enlightened person.'
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > ---  "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That isn't a contradiction, Jason. You may *disagree*
> > > > with him, and that's fine. But he's made a clear
> > > > distinction above between "the intelligence which
> > > > created the universe" and the power or intelligences
> > > > that control the enlightened person's actions.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > ---  "Jason" <jedi_spock@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Read what he wrote below.  BTW, talking to you is like 
> > > talking to a bot.
> > > 
> ---  "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > If you only *paid attention*, Jason, you wouldn't get
> > so confused.
> > 
> > Below he's explaining *MMY's* definition of Unity
> > Consciousness, and his experience of it while he was
> > enlightened. He no longer believes in what MMY said
> > about it; that's what he explained above.
> > 
> > Get it now?
> 
> But, he says 'it was very much his experience'.  Line number 
> three below.

See line numbers two ad three of my paragraph above.

And then read the sentence above that beginning "If you
only *paid attention*..."


> > > >  --- "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > By definition Unity Consciousness means the individual  
> > > > > intention for one's actions does not start with oneself. 
> > > > > It starts with cosmic intelligence. This was very much  
> > > > > my experience. So, unless cosmic intelligence decided to 
> > > > > make accomplishing the flying sidhi the criterion for  
> > > > > Unity Consciousness; that is, cosmic intelligence, in a 
> > > > > given moment decided to make someone fly through the  
> > > > > flying sidhi, the mere demand that one prove one's  
> > > > > enlightenment by being able to fly, well it is absurd.  
> > > > > Because it suggests that one's behaviour becomes subject 
> > > > > to the control and command of another person. Each and  
> > > > > every action of some one who is enlightened is  
> > > > > determined by cosmic intelligence, not individual  
> > > > > intention separate from this cosmic intelligence.
> >
>


Reply via email to