It is easy to argue that making sure that the Middle Class has a bit more money to spend contributes directly to employment, but given the spending habits of the ultra-wealthy, it is hard to make that argument for them instead.
L --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > I heard today that the income of six largest stock holders of Walmart > is equal to the income of the bottom 30% of US population.* > > * my apologies if I got the exact metrics of this comparison wrong. > > And what you may not realize is that I am all for reaping the rewards of > one's efforts. That's how my work life is structured and that of my > wife's. But you seem to espouse an all or nothing attitude. Extending > tax cuts for the individuals making over $250,00/yr. is not going to > have any significant impact on job growth. > > Certainly it may have some incrmental impact, but nowhere near the > rheteric that is being used to support this. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: > > > > > We live in a nation of money > > > worshiping fools. > > > > The very reason Capitalism works best in this day and age! Now if we > were all sweet, loving and non-greedy people, like YOU, we could have > socialism or even Communism. Too bad were not all enlightened (like > you)? > > >
