--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > On Jul 18, 2012, at 4:55 PM, wgm4u wrote: > > > > And he's been told this by several (I've lost count, it's > > > somewhere between five and eight) TM teachers and former > > > TM teachers, right here on FFL. > > > > Where's the checking notes when you need them, like Duh! > > Isn't it there in black and white? > > Oh gawd, only two logical fallacies in one sentence - I > remember when editors really knew how to edit. > > If there was a paragraph I'd expect at least a couple of burning > strawmen! Heck if Judy wants to one-up ole Curtis, she should > hire her self out to freshman logic classes for her Platonic > fallacies alone! She could always get herself a cheap tablet in > case human-human interaction was required...
Notice that Vaj has not identified any logical fallacies in what I wrote. Instead, he writes a colorful but essentially meaningless paragraph designed to distract attention from the fact that his "logical fallacies" claim was equally empty of meaning. > What anyone, who stands outside of TM for a while will > understand Billy is that in the "rest-activity" spiel, only > one thing is being added. And the mind already has activity > (thoughts). So therefore the only thing being added is > (alleged) transcendence. So therefore the goal of TM is, > ipso facto, to transcend. The more you transcend, the > better - the less you transcend, well..return to the mantra > (rinse, repeat as necessary). > > The manas cogitates quite well on it's own thank you! It's no wonder Vaj didn't make any progress with TM.
