--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Ann and Buck,
> 
> 
> I'm baffled by  all this.  I was totally out of the Dome for 7 years, 2003 
> to 2010.  During that time I openly participated in lots of stuff in FF, 
> including Waking Down in Mutuality for about 3 years.  But I had no trouble 
> getting back into the Dome.  No interrogation room, etc.  Also through 
> Amma's org, I've been having planetary pujas done for a while now plus use 
> her jyotishis.  Movement got too expensive and wanted a person to supply 
> family info also.  Too much of a hassle.  And even when I was a grad 
> student on campus, I was open about participating in David Deida tantric 
> workshops.  Again no interrogation room, no subtle threats, etc.
> 
> 
> All I can figure is that they let me alone because I'm just a sidha, not a 
> gov.  But I don't know for sure.  Now that I'm back in the Dome, sometimes 
> friends on campus aren't as friendly as they were.  Sometimes that hurts.  
> But I sort of understand.  And I have friends in town.  TSR dontcha know.  
> Town Super Radiance.  And jokingly means "taking seminars regularly."  
> OTOH, truth in jest, etc.  
> Share in town and in Dome...
 
Dear Share,

My take on all this policing of persons who go outside of the spiritual 
resources sanctioned by the TM Movement is pretty simple. Those who devise and 
enforce these rules (which originated in Maharishi himself) are going by their 
first experience of what TM and Maharishi represented: This is The Way; there 
is no other way that compares to the TM-Maharishi way.

TM is defined as the simplest and most natural technique to take one to the 
deepest level of one's very being—there is no other practice which is defined 
mechanically and objectively such as to afford the most efficient way of 
transcending—there are no competitors here.

The most profound realization one has when one is made a teacher of TM by 
Maharishi, is: this is It. There isn't anything else. And if TM cannot do what 
it says it does—take one to the level of pure consciousness—then we are selling 
a product which does not do what we say it does.

Any compromise on this policy of guarding "the purity of the teaching" will 
mean the gradual corruption of TM and the dilution of Maharishi's Teaching, 
That is one thing that Maharishi was able to do that no other teacher in our 
lifetime has been able to do: Make us experience that he was the very best, the 
only one, and that what he was giving to us was coming directly from reality or 
God or the source of creative intelligence.

Any flexibility, reasonableness, tolerance here just makes no sense at 
all—unless the people at the top are giving up their claim to the exclusiveness 
of TM as being the most beautiful way to transcend that is available anywhere. 
I refer readers (who have done TM) to their first TM experience. How it 
happened; what the process was like; how they experienced the mantra working 
inside of them. The very miraculous innocence—and profundity—of this experience 
signifies: No competition will be allowed—because what could produce an 
experience equal to the one you first had when you started TM?

I don't say the policy is justified on the basis of TM being what Maharishi 
made us believe it was, and what our experiences—at least for awhile—confirmed, 
because of course I don't think that TM and Maharishi have continued to get the 
grace and support which would indicate that reality and God still think they 
are It. But in terms of the truth of one's devotion to one's Master, and 
Maharishi brilliant and unchallengeable authority to persuade us of his 
preeminent position and status in Creation—and his gift to us in the form of 
his spiritual technology—what the TMO is doing in being careful about vetting 
persons who meditate in the Dome is not only reasonable, it is entirely 
truthful to their conscience, their understanding of the will of Maharishi, and 
their own sense of what is the right thing to do.

This behaviour on the part of those who wield this authority over meditators is 
irreproachable in my estimation. Of course if these persons believed that there 
was another path to God, to the Self, to enlightenment, then the enforcement of 
these policies would be subject to moral scrutiny. Inside the context of what 
they deem as truth and the means of not betraying the wishes of their Master, 
they are behaving entirely appropriately—There simply is no argument to be made 
against them whatsoever.
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: awoelflebater <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:02 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM, the Dome Badge, and Religious Practices
>  
> 
>   
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Om, waht oh.  I may lose my Dome badge, again.  I got called in by the 
> > > > chief inspector the other day over my religious activities with non-TM 
> > > > pundits.  If it goes badly they'll take my Dome badge away, again.  It 
> > > > is still in the balance but it is an interesting thing; they have these 
> > > > anti-religious practices paragraphs in the Dome meditation admission 
> > > > guidelines that are a snare.  The paragraphs are part of a business 
> > > > plan to coerce people to use TM movement joytish astrology and yagya 
> > > > services more exclusively by using the dome admission as a punishment.  
> > > > I had an hour long interview in the Peace Palace the other day.  Some 
> > > > committee that I'll not see will adjudicate my case.  "We have 
> > > > something in our files, tell us about it."
> > > 
> > > 
> > > How do the TM inspectors [had a good laugh typing that] find out
> > > you are using non-approved "services?" Is there a supergrass in
> > > FF? And what the hell business do you think it is of theirs?
> > > 
> > > Hope you tell them to stuff their stupid dome badge. Really, what
> > > is the point of all this if this is the sort of "positivity" that
> > > TM creates?
> > >
> > 
> > Sal, how?  The 'course office' works it like East German Secret Police 
> > Stasi doing case work.  They work it all the time.  Search local papers for 
> > leads, the internet, make interviews, hear conversations in the Domes or 
> > meal hall on campus or around, some people also feel it their duty to tell 
> > them things, and then they squeeze people.  They make files and network the 
> > files.  These are TM career people who are very good at what they do.  
> > These are apparatchiks who are unquestioningly loyal subordinates.   For 
> > them it is about enforcing the guidelines.  If they had better guidelines 
> > they would enforce them too.  It is a lot like being confronted with that 
> > German officer investigator actor in Inglorious Bastards. 
> > http://voices.yahoo.com/inglorious-bastards-using-tarantinos-movie-teaching-5616344.html
> >  
> > That's the course office and the system that set it up.  Evidently it is 
> > the best we have to work with.
> >
> 
> Wow Buck, you put up with a lot in order to be able to meditate in the Dome 
> and operate within the confines of the TM secret police. I had no idea. If 
> any of this had been going on back in 1976-1980 I would have been out of 
> there, real fast. I guess what you gain is worth this kind of terrible, 
> freedom-squelching monitoring? Is this for real? I haven't been paying 
> attention or following any of this at FFL so I am a bit shocked now that I 
> actually read one of these posts. I guess you need the collective group 
> energy that the dome provides when you do your siddhis? You couldn't just 
> sort of hop around in your own home and essentially be flipping these Nazi's 
> a bird at the same time as you burn your dome badge? Jeezuz, I would love to 
> be in Fairfield just to give these assholes a run for their money. I could 
> think of all sorts of fun scenarios because, frankly, I wouldn't give a damn 
> and just the opportunity to raise a couple of hackles on these guy's backs
>  would be worth the price of admission. Good luck with that. But remember, 
> certain things are only worth so much boot licking.
>


Reply via email to