--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Although I will not interact with Dan Friedman any more, > because I feel that to do so encourages his obvious > mental illness, I feel the need to do what Curtis had > to do recently. > > Dan has NEVER sent me an email. Not one. I have the > records of all of the email services I use to prove it. > > This guy is a nut case. His threats of violence against > me have already been reported to the proper authorities. > I encourage others here to stop encouraging him in his > delusional fantasies. To do so is to legally put yourself > at risk if he ever acts out on his threats. > > As a note to "asleep at the wheel" Rick Archer, you are > equally at risk. Check the case law on this. http://tinyurl.com/cdbyjd
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgMdz2fe0CY > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, danfriedman2002 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > seventhray1, > > > > Quit hiding behind you bullshit of "there are many interpretations to posts > > here", it's way too close to explanations provided by the brave Nazi > > supporters. Don't like my tone? Then quit bullshitting. > > > > Interesting that you tell me to get over an incident that insulted and > > disgusted my wife, while you get yourself all tied-up-in-your=panties about > > my correcting you. Why don't you admit that you were wrong and move on? > > Good friendly advice. > > > > The last thing you said would have merit, if it too, weren't completely > > wrong. I explained directly to you that finding out who the true Batty is > > sickened me, and prompted my posting. I also explained that I would not > > have had to post anything had Batty replied to my friendly-tone emails. > > > > And yes, you are acting the fool. But you can change. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > As I said Dan, there are many interpretations to posts here . I reread > > > the the link Judy provided. Barry was being his usual mischievous self > > > and poking fun at you through your error. FFL has never been known for > > > its proper manners, or apologies. Do you think it might be time to get > > > over this event that happened 1-1/2 years ago? Was it that egregious an > > > offense that you need to bring it up like it happend yesterday? Either > > > way is fine with me, but I do reserve the right to chime in with my > > > opinion, and certainly you have right to call me a fool. > > > > > > Oh I just reread what you wrote below. And that is fascinating about > > > receiving books and tapes all pertaining to this very event or maybe > > > just about Barry in general. Either way that is impressive. I mean, > > > what could be next? A documentary? > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, danfriedman2002 <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > seventhray1, > > > > > > > > I am not surprised that you wrote to Ann, rather than to me; it says a > > > lot about you. > > > > > > > > My words are correct, yours, not-so-much. > > > > > > > > So where shall I begin? "With your being too lazy to look it up" > > > before making your incredulous accusation. Lazy, lazy, lazy...but I > > > think you know that. What you don't seem to understand is common > > > decency, for which there is no easy remedy, other than to confront your > > > lying face (and not with 'I may be right here, or I may be wrong, but > > > believe me, I'm right'. Pussy - and again, not with the good meaning. > > > > > > > > Barry fucking Googled my wife, then proceeded to email her the > > > strangest words she had ever read. She was rightfully disgusted. When I > > > asked Barry about what he had done, he offered no decency. He is devoid > > > of decency, as I see is more common that I'd known. > > > > > > > > There is nothing new here for me, other than you're strange post. What > > > has changed is that I now know a great deal more about Barry. That is > > > good for me. > > > > > > > > P.S. You seem to be in a great minority with your misinformed opinion. > > > I have received emails of encouragement, books, tapes and well-wishes > > > from others who know that I'm correct IN EVERY WORD I WRITE. Something > > > you should learn. Stop your bullshitting. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ann, > > > > > > > > > > I think if you check into this you will find that Dan's accusation > > > of > > > > > Barry bringing Dan's wife into a dispute is not correct. > > > > > > > > > > For one, I think the alleged transgration took place about two years > > > > > ago. Or maybe it was a little less. I am too lazy to look it up, and > > > > > so may be proved wrong. But as I mentioned before, I believe it was > > > Dan > > > > > who made a post to Barry using his wife's e-mail account. Barry then > > > > > commented on that in his postings here, and that seemed to infuriate > > > > > Dan. > > > > > > > > > > Judy recently posted the exchanage, I believe. But I think a wrong > > > > > impression is being given by Dan. > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps a rereading of the exchange will prove me wrong, or at least > > > be > > > > > show the possibility of different interpretations. We have a lot of > > > > > that here. > > > > > > > > > > There seems to be intense hatred of Barry by Dan. I am not sure why > > > > > this old issue is being brought up as though it were new. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This is ramping up nicely to be the ultimate pissing match between > > > two > > > > > testosterone > > > > > > fueled individuals who refuse to back down. Just what we need now. > > > > > > Barry, how about taking the high road and leave Dan' s wife out of > > > > > this? Conflict resolution is not your strong point but surely you > > > > > possess some grey cells that could pass for a brain. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More on this developing story as it emerges... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As promised... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ AP ] Police and DEA agents in New York City, working > > > > > > > in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security, > > > > > > > are hot on the trail of a B, V, and C addict whom they > > > > > > > have been notified has become so deranged by the drug > > > > > > > that he's making threats over the Internet. The DHS has > > > > > > > become involved because making such threats is now a > > > > > > > crime that falls under the domain of Homeland Security. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DEA agent Hank Schrader, asked to comment, said, "See? > > > > > > > We *told* you that B, V, and C were dangerous! Look what > > > > > > > they have done to this poor guy. Either that or the cult > > > > > > > meditation thing he's into." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DHS agents caution the public not to be concerned, because > > > > > > > they have the threat-maker under surveillance, and have > > > > > > > forwarded his threats to his wife to let her know who > > > > > > > exactly she is married to. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
