--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> Although I will not interact with Dan Friedman any more,
> because I feel that to do so encourages his obvious 
> mental illness, I feel the need to do what Curtis had
> to do recently. 
> 
> Dan has NEVER sent me an email. Not one. I have the 
> records of all of the email services I use to prove it.
> 
> This guy is a nut case. His threats of violence against
> me have already been reported to the proper authorities.
> I encourage others here to stop encouraging him in his
> delusional fantasies. To do so is to legally put yourself
> at risk if he ever acts out on his threats. 
 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/318700?threaded=1&l=1

> As a note to "asleep at the wheel" Rick Archer, you are
> equally at risk. Check the case law on this.
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, danfriedman2002 <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > seventhray1,
> > 
> > Quit hiding behind you bullshit of "there are many interpretations to posts 
> > here", it's way too close to explanations provided by the brave Nazi 
> > supporters. Don't like my tone? Then quit bullshitting.
> > 
> > Interesting that you tell me to get over an incident that insulted and 
> > disgusted my wife, while you get yourself all tied-up-in-your=panties about 
> > my correcting you. Why don't you admit that you were wrong and move on? 
> > Good friendly advice.
> > 
> > The last thing you said would have merit, if it too, weren't completely 
> > wrong. I explained directly to you that finding out who the true Batty is 
> > sickened me, and prompted my posting. I also explained that I would not 
> > have had to post anything had Batty replied to my friendly-tone emails.
> > 
> > And yes, you are acting the fool. But you can change.
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> > >
> > > As I said Dan, there are many interpretations to posts here .  I reread
> > > the the link Judy provided.  Barry was being his usual mischievous self
> > > and poking fun at you through your error.  FFL has never been known for
> > > its proper manners, or apologies.  Do you think it might be time to get
> > > over this event that happened 1-1/2 years ago?  Was it that egregious an
> > > offense that you need to bring it up like it happend yesterday?   Either
> > > way is fine with me, but I do reserve the right to chime in with my
> > > opinion, and certainly you have right to call me a fool.
> > > 
> > > Oh I just reread what you wrote below.  And that is fascinating about
> > > receiving books and tapes all pertaining to this very event or maybe
> > > just about Barry in general.  Either way that is impressive.  I mean,
> > > what could be next?  A documentary?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, danfriedman2002 <no_reply@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > seventhray1,
> > > >
> > > > I am not surprised that you wrote to Ann, rather than to me; it says a
> > > lot about you.
> > > >
> > > > My words are correct, yours, not-so-much.
> > > >
> > > > So where shall I begin? "With your being too lazy to look it up"
> > > before making your incredulous accusation. Lazy, lazy, lazy...but I
> > > think you know that. What you don't seem to understand is common
> > > decency, for which there is no easy remedy, other than to confront your
> > > lying face (and not with 'I may be right here, or I may be wrong, but
> > > believe me, I'm right'. Pussy - and again, not with the good meaning.
> > > >
> > > > Barry fucking Googled my wife, then proceeded to email her the
> > > strangest words she had ever read. She was rightfully disgusted. When I
> > > asked Barry about what he had done, he offered no decency. He is devoid
> > > of decency, as I see is more common that I'd known.
> > > >
> > > > There is nothing new here for me, other than you're strange post. What
> > > has changed is that I now know a great deal more about Barry. That is
> > > good for me.
> > > >
> > > > P.S. You seem to be in a great minority with your misinformed opinion.
> > > I have received emails of encouragement, books, tapes and well-wishes
> > > from others who know that I'm correct IN EVERY WORD I WRITE. Something
> > > you should learn. Stop your bullshitting.
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ann,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think if you check into this you will find that Dan's accusation
> > > of
> > > > > Barry bringing Dan's wife into a dispute is not correct.
> > > > >
> > > > > For one, I think the alleged transgration took place about two years
> > > > > ago. Or maybe it was a little less. I am too lazy to look it up, and
> > > > > so may be proved wrong. But as I mentioned before, I believe it was
> > > Dan
> > > > > who made a post to Barry using his wife's e-mail account. Barry then
> > > > > commented on that in his postings here, and that seemed to infuriate
> > > > > Dan.
> > > > >
> > > > > Judy recently posted the exchanage, I believe. But I think a wrong
> > > > > impression is being given by Dan.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps a rereading of the exchange will prove me wrong, or at least
> > > be
> > > > > show the possibility of different interpretations. We have a lot of
> > > > > that here.
> > > > >
> > > > > There seems to be intense hatred of Barry by Dan. I am not sure why
> > > > > this old issue is being brought up as though it were new.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is ramping up nicely to be the ultimate pissing match between
> > > two
> > > > > testosterone
> > > > > > fueled individuals who refuse to back down. Just what we need now.
> > > > > > Barry, how about taking the high road and leave Dan' s wife out of
> > > > > this? Conflict resolution is not your strong point but surely you
> > > > > possess some grey cells that could pass for a brain.
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More on this developing story as it emerges...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As promised...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ AP ] Police and DEA agents in New York City, working
> > > > > > > in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security,
> > > > > > > are hot on the trail of a B, V, and C addict whom they
> > > > > > > have been notified has become so deranged by the drug
> > > > > > > that he's making threats over the Internet. The DHS has
> > > > > > > become involved because making such threats is now a
> > > > > > > crime that falls under the domain of Homeland Security.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > DEA agent Hank Schrader, asked to comment, said, "See?
> > > > > > > We *told* you that B, V, and C were dangerous! Look what
> > > > > > > they have done to this poor guy. Either that or the cult
> > > > > > > meditation thing he's into."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > DHS agents caution the public not to be concerned, because
> > > > > > > they have the threat-maker under surveillance, and have
> > > > > > > forwarded his threats to his wife to let her know who
> > > > > > > exactly she is married to.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to