--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In light of both last year's tsunami and Katrina, the issue has 
been 
> brought up in the media that the loss of human life and damages in 
> BOTH cases could have been greatly minimized had proper preparation 
> been made.
> 
> It wasn't that experts didn't envision that a tsunami could happen 
> or that the levees in New Orleans could have broken, it's just the 
> odds seemed to make it so unlikely that public policy in this area 
> didn't make spending the millions or billions to prevent what could 
> have been prevented.
> 
> I contrast this with the building of hydro-electric dams.  The 
> little I know about them is this: a dam is built in order to create 
> a massive reservoir of water so that the power of the water from 
> these masses can be channeled into turning turbines which, in turn, 
> create electricity.
> 
> But the danger inherent in every dam in spillover: too much water 
in 
> a reservoir can either destroy the environment or -- as is the case 
> with Hoover Dam -- destroy the generating facility. 
> 
> So with every dam is built a "spillway", a structure in which 
> spillovers can be safely channelled away from creating a disaster.  
> At Hoover DAm you can see a massive concrete tunnel beside the 
> facility built specifically for this purpose.
> 
> I once took a tour of a hydroelectric dam in Northern Quebec at 
> James Bay.  At one point beside the reservoir near a dyke was a 
> massive set of concrete steps that, I was told, cost hundreds of 
> millions of dollars to build and, at the top of the stairs built 
> into the side of the reservoir was a gate that could be opened; a 
> spillway in other words.
> 
> The tour guide mentioned that, statistically, overspill would 
happen 
> only once every 100 years!
> 
> Yet the company spent hundreds of millions of dollars to plan for 
> something that the builders would, statistically, not even see in 
> their own lifetime, not ever see the practical benefit of.
> 
> This type of planning happened with private enterprise (note that 
> Bechtel built the dam, please!) Perhaps there is a disconnect 
> between this type of planning in private enterprise and public 
> policy enterprises...

You don't read much on this group. The $250 million that was to be 
spent last year on strengthening New Orlean's levees was spent on the 
war in Iraq instead.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to