All the while perpetuating this clique, this white, mid-western, ole boy network.
No matter how many times Barry and Curtis get humiliated by me, they are needy, clueless, shameless -- they will always manage to deceive, con, attract some innocent naive, gullible liberals, with their deceptive writing, the Xenos, the Susans, the Steves. But they will not fool the cogent, coherent, compelling Mavericks of this list, The Judy Stein's, The Robin Carlsen's, The Bob Price's of this list. I feel contempt and disgust for these two MF'ers - Curtis and Barry. I have no need to hide behind any political correctness, any white man's guilt, burden to call it as I see it and I spare none. My forefathers were equal opportunity racists, however a true Brahmin first works on his own biases, fears, insecurities, anxieties before going after others - he doesn't even spare his own family and I haven't - other than my sisters but such is the conditioning, love of an Indian brother. What's the most that one can do - kill me? I'll mock and laugh at my own body's frailty, fragility, even as I watch it wringing, writhing, agonizing in pain. And then the world will celebrate the glory of the only Brahmin of this world - Ravi Chivukula - his brutal-self honesty and integrity, his commitment to truth, his fearlessness that even death couldn't touch him. That's the Hindu metaphor of a Brahmin - nothing you can earn by birth, it's only accidental that I have been one. The kshatriyas(warriors, kings, administrators) of the past wouldn't touch such a Brahmin - because they knew he had conquered death, they would seek their advice, because they knew he would call it without any bias. Indians talk about a story of how Alexander the Great met such a Brahmin - it could just be a myth for all we know. Such a Brahmin can only be defeated by a woman - he has to be, it has to be so, so he learns to be ever humble, to be ever watchful, change, modify, finetune his behavior, his actions, his biases, his motivations - knowing that the existence - the dynamic, organic, mysterious entity can whup his ass anytime, at its own will, at its own fancy. Yours arrogantly, humbly, hatingly, lovingly, Ravi Chivukula. On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com>wrote: > Dear Curtis, > > And you will always be morally, spiritually , ethically bankrupt as long > as you support Barry's antics. Your progressive values are always suspect. > > Your stories of young African American kids may warm the hearts of naive, > innocent liberals but it doesn't fool me. > > It's just white man's guilt, white man's burden nicely wrapped as a set of > beliefs for you to play wolf on others like Ravi Chivukula. > > Ravi, who worked in housing projects, smiled, loved even at the age of 23, > not even bothered if he was addressed as a b**ch, motherf**ker, because he > understood the love. I loved their heart, their music - rap, gospel music, > I had experience through a whole cross section of African Americans from > crude, innocent, to educated, sophisticated - Dr. Thompson and the > secretary Mary - I was touched by their love, they treated me like their > own child, their eyes would lit up as I would walk in - it was like being > back in India. My love for African-Americans, women and gays is unmatched - > not a convenient set of nicely wrapped beliefs to play wolf on others. > > So I pity your ass, but any time you try to wade into any kind of moral, > spiritual, ethical voice here - I warn you - I will whup your ass and > parade your dishonesty here for everyone to see. > > So please do me a favor - just stick to your writing - it's beautiful. > > Love, > Ravi > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Ravi Chivukula > <chivukula.r...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> It's not the fact that he is just dead. >> >> You yourself have no honesty and integrity to question him - that man is >> at least dead, you are alive. >> >> Just wake up and take care of yourself, rather than your fixation on him. >> What moral, ethical, spiritual principles you have - you can continue your >> fixations, fantasies on Maharishi but don't expect you not being called on >> it every time you do that. >> >> Prove us you are not Maitreya of Morons here, you are rehabilitating, >> good we all applaud it. The Morons who parade their emotionally demented, >> deranged, depraved misogynist, homophobic nonsense here day in and day out, >> abusing and taunting others from posting here, their 17 year old paranoid, >> delusional, narcissistic fantasies. You yourself had the the temerity to >> brand Judy as being full of malice, of trying to slander you, man the gall, >> arrogance and the stupidity. >> >> I feel pity for your ass. >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:26 PM, curtisdeltablues < >> curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> ** >>> >>> >>> Thanks for verifying the triplets MMY story Nabbie, I was just guessing. >>> What course was that on? >>> >>> I am curious about this arbitrary fixation on his deadness. I thought >>> you guys believed that he is still with us somewhere between Marley's ghost >>> and the thought in meditation that inspires the marketing crew to try some >>> new scheme to get TM into the lives beyond the 687 people who still >>> practice it exclusively now. >>> >>> So you think a guy like Maharishi actually dies? And how do you imagine >>> my "bashing" affects him? Is it like a disturbance in sleep like when >>> someone in the bed farts and we almost wake up and then turn over? Or does >>> it really get to him, do my words cause him to gnash his teeth and pound >>> his fist into his hands in a Sienfeldesque "CURTIS!" Does he shake his fist >>> at the sky like Jon Stewart and curse me from beyond the grave? Does he try >>> to extract retribution on me in this world to get me back in some way like >>> moving a chair when I sleep so I stub my toe during a mid-sleep groggy >>> bathroom run? Exactly how pissed do my words make this spirit of Maharishi >>> you imagine? Should I invest in a voodoo doll of him to avoid his evil eye? >>> >>> Now of course if your point was that when I posted the same perspective >>> when he was alive he had a chance to challenge what I said directly, I >>> would agree. I think we are both glad that he took so many opportunities to >>> give his side here while he was living, and I do miss those exchanges. >>> >>> And how far does this ban about speaking ill of the dead extend Nabbie. >>> Do we include Napoleon, Sun Myng Moon, John Lennon? What is the key aspect >>> of the unfairness you seem to resent about it all? >>> >>> What if we have a public figure who is so boring that he might as well >>> be dead like King Tony? Do I have to include him in the don't speak about >>> the dead ban. Should we just ban all histories of famous dead people if the >>> perspective isn't only positive? >>> >>> Or was this whole thing just a protective instinct, misguided though I >>> believe it to be, to protect the magical illusions he tried to sell us all >>> about himself during his life? >>> >>> Oh shit I have a fleck of dust in my eye...hey wait a minute...wasn't he >>> a pile of dust the last time we saw him... >>> >>> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > Who would >>> wish that on anybody? >>> > >>> > >>> > Ravi was right ofcourse, it didn't take long before the >>> hillbilly-singer was back where he left us last time and where he's feeling >>> most comfortable: Maharishi-bashing. >>> > If all else fails in life it's great to have someone to bash, >>> particularily someone who's dead, don't you think ? >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
