http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319660
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > This was Share's reply. I didn't have time to go back and find the post > she was responding to. And then there was the post when Robin responded > as Susan,and then when he responded as you, a day or so ago. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/post?act=reply&messageNum=31\ > 9538 > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/post?act=reply&messageNum=3\ > 19538> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > Hey Steve, > > > > First thanks for the kind words about my poo poo platter image and > secondly, would you mind pointing out the post in question. I have > skipped a bunch of Robin's posts that look like they are just video > links so it didn't register. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ > > > wrote: > > > much snipping > > > > > I have to think, Judy, that you would take exception to someone > > > > > describing an entirely fictitious conversation with you as > though > > > > > it had occurred. I also think that you might take exception to > > > > > someone writing posts with your byline, > > > > > > > > (Steve has explained he didn't mean using someone else's > > > > account ID.) > > > > > > > > even if it is done in the > > > > > name of so called irony. My feeling is that you would request > > > > > that such a person refrain from doing that. > > > > > > > > It would depend, Steve. And certainly Curtis and Share > > > > are free to object or make such a request if they think > > > > anybody might have been misled. > > > > > > > > But it was obvious to me that the "conspiracy" bit and > > > > the paragraph Robin wrote and signed "Curtis" were both > > > > ironic. And frankly, I'd be astonished if everyone didn't > > > > realize this. > > > > > > Yes, I am sure everyone did realize it. It is just something I > would > > > not take the liberty of doing. Perhaps I am more sensitive along > these > > > lines. Of course Share did respond that she had not participated > in > > > the discussion to which Robin indicated she was a party. I picked > up > > > that she wasn't too thrilled about being misrepresented. > > > And also, > > > > Irony is pretty easy to detect if one is in good contact > > > > with reality, because the variance from reality in the > > > > ironic material is clear. It's really just a matter of > > > > common sense. > > > I don't think anyone is missing the irony. But irony just like > anything > > > can be in good taste or poor taste. In my opinion, Robin's irony > > > sometimes crosses a line most people would not appreciate. > > > But it may not be enough for them to make a protest. It is not that > big > > > a deal for me either. But since we were discussing issues along > these > > > lines, I brought it up. > > > > > >
