--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Wading through all this I caught a glimpse of something about my replying to > my own reply!
I've been reading all the posts, and I didn't see anything like that, Share. I think you must have misunderstood something somebody said.  Everyone, this tells me that I was right in my earlier email to Ann. > Time to bow out. Obviously I am unable to keep track of my own writing much > less anyone else's. > > > However, if someone still has issue with my part in all this, you are welcome > to email me directly. I'll try to answer your concern and or question. > > > Sorry I can't reply directly to everyone who has been supportive. Thank you > so much. Soldier on. But have fun too > > > ________________________________ > From: seventhray1 <steve.sundur@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 7:28 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my > turn!" > > >  > Judy, you do leave me speechless. Almost. It is at this point I reflect > on the last Narnia book, "The Last Battle", when the ape "Shift" turns the > truth upside down. And succeeds in doing so for a while. I guess that's a > difference between that book and FFL. I don't think anyone is fooled here, > even for a moment. > I hope Robin doesn't turn on you here Judy. That could happen you know. >  > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ wrote: > > > > > > This would be funny if it weren't so sad. Curtis is being pummeled > > > because he has requested that Robin not make false quotes that are > > > attributable to Curtis. > > > > No, that isn't why he's being pummeled. > > > > But his lunch is indeed getting eaten. He should be grateful > > we aren't drinking his milkshake as well. > > > > We may get around to that, though. > > > > > > > > > Here we are on the playground. Robin steals Curtis' lunch. Curtis > > > objects. > > > > > > Robin: "I never heard you say you wanted that lunch" > > > > > > Curtis: "Well I just assumed....." > > > > > > Robin: "Assumed what? How do I know you wanted to eat your lunch if you > > > didn't say so? > > > > > > Curtis: "Normally I just eat my own lunch. Isn't that how it works?" > > > > > > Judy rambling up: "Yea, I didn't hear you say you wanted to eat your > > > lunch. That makes it fair game. If you want your lunch, let's hear > > > why. And it better be good" > > > > > > Robin: "Come on Judy. You eat the PP@J <mailto:PP@J , and I'll eat > > > the Snickers bar and the jello" > > > > > > And off they go into the distance with Curtis' lunch > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > curtisdeltablues@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "maskedzebra" <maskedzebra@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Curtis, > > > > > > > > > > > > Take the two instances where I have attempted to represent > > > > > > your voice, and specify which passages in either post you > > > > > > feel are untruthful; that is, you would not say what I have > > > > > > you saying. "There were many statements in what you wrote > > > > > > that I wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated". If > > > > > > there are such statements, this tends to defeat my argument. > > > > > > I would like some examples. > > > > > > > > > > I only read the last one, I couldn't find the first one. And > > > > > no I don't need to go over the post to prove to you it doesn't > > > > > represent my POV. > > > > > > > > You sure as hell do if you want to make a case for the > > > > assertion Robin quotes, Curtis. > > > > > > > > You won't because you can't. > > > > > > > > Here's the first one, by the way: > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319527 > > > > > > > > > >
