On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:37 PM, curtisdeltablues < curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ** > > > I appreciate your taking a swing at it. I don't think much "spinning" is > necessary. You gave the project so little thought. Any thoughtful person > would understand what went down here. And it probably wasn't that you did > some research beforehand to pick the 4th use of the term,and then used it > improperly according to the dictionary, but properly for the first few > definitions.... deliberately. > > You've just turned in sloppy work because of your over confidence and > contempt for me. > Curtis - it was a rhetorical question of mine to point to the deception, manipulation, bullying you engage in here. Even if it meant literally I would be nuts to think Sal would have meant any physical harm to Emily - so no sloppy work here Curtis, contempt on my part - yes, your usual sleight of hand - yes, your usual twisting, manipulating context - yes, your seven layered progressively cruder,baser,grosser deception - yes. > > At least now I can go back to Raunchy's spin with some more insight into > your thinking process. > > That later post about her spin was a classic. > > I'll bet you never got away stealing any curds and ghee, did you baby > Krishna? > LOL..OK this is seriously funny. Oh no I am very deceptive, but unlike you it's not to maintain my self-deception. Anyway what a shame - a talented man like you has to resort to all this drama !!! Looks like you need some love and attention - so XOXOXOXOXO - love ya baby. Ravi
