Ravi, this one did NOT make me laugh. Not right to sign the names of others. Even as a joke. IMO Share
________________________________ From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 1:25 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Subject Of Every Judy Stein Post -- EVERY One Wow - this is just beautiful Barry, even dimwits like us can feel your brilliance, intelligence and compassion. Have you ever thought of being a priest or a Rabbi - oh well perhaps next lifetime - I know how much you enjoy creeping out strange women by trying to feel their asses. Yours ever admiringly, Steve & Susan. On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:32 PM, turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > >The thing is, almost everyone here already knows this. >They know that the description below describes virtually >ALL of Judy Stein's posts, and that she's got almost >nothing else she can talk about. It's the same subject >and the same *intent*, over and over and over and over. >Every week, every month, every year, every decade. > >And yet. > >And yet people still fall for it. She can still turn >Fairfield Life into the insane asylum it was yesterday >by simply trotting out the Same Old Subject, expressing >the Same Old Intent, because she knows that several >people will pile on to it and turn it into a flurry >of posts, ALL of them basically either agreeing about >who she's decided is BAD today, or defending them. > >Here's the thing -- "defending" them creates as many >pile on posts as agreeing with her. So it's not just the >minions who almost always pile on and join Judy in >attacking the BAD Person du Jour -- Raunchydog, Ravi, >Ann, Robin, and Jim Flanegin (doctordumbass) who are >perpetuating these Attack Threads. It's ALSO the >people who feel that they're "defending" the person >or persons being attacked. > >Argue with her or agree with her -- if you reply to >one of her single-subject attack posts, you're helping >to perpetuate it. If you're part of the disruptive >thread, you're helping to create the disruptive thread, >and have thus lost your right to complain about the >disruption. > >There is wisdom in the saying DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS. > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: >> >> Someone here is BAD. >> It could be Curtis, it could be Vaj, it could be Barry, >> or it could be someone who has praised them, >> supported them, or even had a pleasant >> conversation with them. >> >> Whoever it is I'm attacking in this post, >> they're BAD, and I'm going to prove it to you. >> Now sit there and listen until I'm through, >> and if you know what is good for you, >> you'll join me in proving they're BAD, too. >> > >