Ravi, this one did NOT make me laugh.  Not right to sign the names of others.  
Even as a joke.  IMO Share



________________________________
 From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Subject Of Every Judy Stein Post -- EVERY 
One
 

  
Wow - this is just beautiful Barry, even dimwits like us can feel your 
brilliance, intelligence and compassion. Have you ever thought of being a 
priest or a Rabbi - oh well perhaps next lifetime - I know how much you enjoy 
creeping out strange women by trying to feel their asses.

Yours ever admiringly,
Steve & Susan.


On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:32 PM, turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
>  
>The thing is, almost everyone here already knows this.
>They know that the description below describes virtually
>ALL of Judy Stein's posts, and that she's got almost
>nothing else she can talk about. It's the same subject
>and the same *intent*, over and over and over and over.
>Every week, every month, every year, every decade.
>
>And yet.
>
>And yet people still fall for it. She can still turn 
>Fairfield Life into the insane asylum it was yesterday
>by simply trotting out the Same Old Subject, expressing
>the Same Old Intent, because she knows that several 
>people will pile on to it and turn it into a flurry 
>of posts, ALL of them basically either agreeing about 
>who she's decided is BAD today, or defending them. 
>
>Here's the thing -- "defending" them creates as many 
>pile on posts as agreeing with her. So it's not just the
>minions who almost always pile on and join Judy in 
>attacking the BAD Person du Jour -- Raunchydog, Ravi,
>Ann, Robin, and Jim Flanegin (doctordumbass) who are
>perpetuating these Attack Threads. It's ALSO the 
>people who feel that they're "defending" the person
>or persons being attacked. 
>
>Argue with her or agree with her -- if you reply to 
>one of her single-subject attack posts, you're helping 
>to perpetuate it. If you're part of the disruptive 
>thread, you're helping to create the disruptive thread, 
>and have thus lost your right to complain about the 
>disruption.
>
>There is wisdom in the saying DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS.
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>>
>> Someone here is BAD.
>> It could be Curtis, it could be Vaj, it could be Barry,
>> or it could be someone who has praised them,
>> supported them, or even had a pleasant
>> conversation with them.
>> 
>> Whoever it is I'm attacking in this post,
>> they're BAD, and I'm going to prove it to you.
>> Now sit there and listen until I'm through,
>> and if you know what is good for you,
>> you'll join me in proving they're BAD, too.
>>
>
>

 

Reply via email to