--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > Well I SUGGESTED moving to Wednesday. Some agreed. Some > > > didn't. > > > > And some didn't like the idea of reserving *any* day > > for this "special" use. > > > > > I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens next > > > week. > > > > > > I like the FFL variety too. I think Marek was suggesting > > > something other than less variety. > > > > I don't believe anyone said Marek was suggesting less > > variety, do you, Share? > > > > I guess you must have misunderstood. The point is that > > the *result* of Marek's suggestion would be less variety > > day to day, because if there were a "special" day every > > week designated for "creative" posts or neat finds, > > folks would tend to save them up so they would have > > something to contribute on that day. As a consequence, > > such posts would no longer be sprinkled as freely > > throughout the week as they are now. > > Judy, you need to re-read Marek's original suggestion because > you have *completely* misunderstood his intentions.
I don't believe I said anything about his intentions, other than that he wasn't suggesting less variety. > The *result* of Marek's suggestion would be less negativity > through arguing, correcting, etc. etc. for at least one day > each week so that some people might actually want to visit > and read some of the posts on that particular day. It's possible that would be one of the results. I never said otherwise. Did you read what I wrote? > Leave it to you to twist it into something else. I didn't twist anything, gully baby. I identified a likely result if Marek's suggestion were carried out. > Feel free to contribute something on Wednesdays if you > wish, or sprinkle it throughout the week. Yes, I hope all of us feel free to contribute whenever we feel like it and don't feel restricted to one "special" day. > You have my permission. And if you insist on misrepresenting > Marek's noble suggestion, Well, now you owe me an apology, because I didn't misrepresent a thing. Do you even know what "misrepresent" means? I'd check Mr. Dictionary if I were you. As far as negativity is concerned, the folks who find it unpleasant might want to speak out against those who are primarily responsible for instigating it. I just might have to come ot NJ and spank you! > > > > > One of the things that's so nice about this kind of > > forum is the spontaneity. I understand that some folks > > find this threatening (it's why we have a posting > > limit, by the way). They'd rather have everything all > > laid out and planned so they know what to expect. > > > > Once you start designating "special" days for this and > > days for that, however, you really end up with a > > different type of forum altogether. Nothing wrong with > > it, but it's not what many folks here are interested in. > > > > Say, Share, when are you going to acknowledge all the > > mistakes you made in our exchange a few weeks ago? I > > mean, you just pointed out my terrible blooper about > > who first mentioned the Hatfields and McCoys, you or > > Ann, and demanded that I acknowledge it--which I did > > immediately. > > > > I think it's about time you acknowledge yours, don't > > you? > > >
